Jason Leopold, et al v. DOJ
| Jason Leopold and BuzzFeed, Inc. |
| United States Department of Justice |
| 22-5300 |
| November 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Freedom of Information Act of 1974 |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1980341] filed granting motion to extend time [ # 1980270-2 ]; directing response to motion for summary affirmance [ # 1979930-2 ] Response due on 02/03/2023 [22-5300] [Entered: 01/05/2023 04:18 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION [1980270] to extend time to file response to 02/03/2023 filed by BuzzFeed, Inc. and Jason Leopold [Service Date: 01/05/2023 ] Length Certification: 233 words. [22-5300] (Topic, Matthew) [Entered: 01/05/2023 01:04 PM] |
| MOTION [1979930] for summary affirmance filed by DOJ (Service Date: 01/03/2023 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 4,211 Words. [22-5300] (Dreier, Douglas) [Entered: 01/03/2023 05:10 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1978225] filed by BuzzFeed, Inc. and Jason Leopold [Service Date: 12/19/2022 ] [22-5300] (Topic, Matthew) [Entered: 12/19/2022 05:49 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1978226] filed by BuzzFeed, Inc. and Jason Leopold [Service Date: 12/19/2022 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [22-5300] (Topic, Matthew) [Entered: 12/19/2022 05:51 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1978227] submitted by BuzzFeed, Inc. and Jason Leopold [Service Date: 12/19/2022 ] [22-5300] (Topic, Matthew) [Entered: 12/19/2022 05:52 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1978224] filed by BuzzFeed, Inc. and Jason Leopold [Service Date: 12/19/2022 ] Intent: AppxNotDeferred [22-5300] (Topic, Matthew) [Entered: 12/19/2022 05:48 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1978223] filed by Matthew Topic on behalf of Appellants BuzzFeed, Inc. and Jason Leopold. [22-5300] (Topic, Matthew) [Entered: 12/19/2022 05:47 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1978218] filed by Douglas C. Dreier on behalf of Appellee DOJ. [22-5300] (Dreier, Douglas) [Entered: 12/19/2022 05:18 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1978220] filed by BuzzFeed, Inc. and Jason Leopold [Service Date: 12/19/2022 ] [22-5300] (Topic, Matthew) [Entered: 12/19/2022 05:44 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1978219] filed by DOJ [Service Date: 12/19/2022 ] [22-5300] (Dreier, Douglas) [Entered: 12/19/2022 05:20 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [1978221] filed by BuzzFeed, Inc. and Jason Leopold [Service Date: 12/19/2022 ] [22-5300] (Topic, Matthew) [Entered: 12/19/2022 05:45 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1974261] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-03192-RC filed by BuzzFeed, Inc. and Jason Leopold. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-5300. [22-5300] [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:37 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1974263] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 12/19/2022. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 12/19/2022. APPELLANT statement of issues due 12/19/2022. APPELLANT underlying decision due 12/19/2022. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 12/19/2022. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 12/19/2022. APPELLANT transcript status report due 12/19/2022. APPELLANT procedural motions due 12/19/2022. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 01/03/2023; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 12/19/2022. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 12/19/2022. APPELLEE procedural motions due 12/19/2022. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 01/03/2023 [22-5300] [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:38 AM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-5300] [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
