USA, et al v. UnitedHealth Group Incorporated, et al
United States of America, State of Minnesota and State of New York |
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated and Change Healthcare Inc. |
22-5301 |
November 21, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK'S ORDER [1974545] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 12/21/2022. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 12/21/2022. APPELLANT statement of issues due 12/21/2022. APPELLANT underlying decision due 12/21/2022. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 12/21/2022. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 12/21/2022. APPELLANT transcript status report due 12/21/2022. APPELLANT procedural motions due 12/21/2022. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 01/05/2023; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 12/21/2022. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 12/21/2022. APPELLEE procedural motions due 12/21/2022. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 01/05/2023 [22-5301] [Entered: 11/21/2022 03:04 PM] |
LETTER [1974536] sent regarding attorney membership to Olga Kogan for State of New York and Katherine Moerke for State of Minnesota. Application for Admission due 12/21/2022. [22-5301] [Entered: 11/21/2022 02:41 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1974535] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-00481-CJN filed by State of Minnesota, State of New York and USA. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-5301. [22-5301] [Entered: 11/21/2022 02:40 PM] |
US CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-5301] [Entered: 11/21/2022 02:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.