Sandpiper Residents Association, et al v. HUD
| Sandpiper Residents Association, Betty Ann Dergin and Larry Bernard Brooks, Sr. |
| United States Department of Housing & Urban Development |
| 22-5334 |
| December 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Statutes APA/Review Agency |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1986515] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 03/29/2023. APPENDIX due 03/29/2023. APPELLEE Brief due on 04/28/2023. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 05/19/2023 [22-5334] [Entered: 02/17/2023 04:32 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1984099] filed by Simon C. Brewer and co-counsel Abby C. Wright on behalf of Appellee HUD. [22-5334] (Brewer, Simon) [Entered: 02/01/2023 10:30 AM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1984101] filed by HUD [Service Date: 02/01/2023 ] [22-5334] (Brewer, Simon) [Entered: 02/01/2023 10:34 AM] |
| STATEMENT [1982057] with Disclosure Listing filed by Larry Bernard Brooks, Sr., Betty Ann Dergin and Sandpiper Residents Association [Service Date: 01/19/2023 ] [22-5334] (Myles, Kimberly) [Entered: 01/19/2023 12:03 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [1981980] filed by Larry Bernard Brooks, Sr., Betty Ann Dergin and Sandpiper Residents Association [Service Date: 01/18/2023 ] [22-5334] (Myles, Kimberly) [Entered: 01/18/2023 07:42 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1981978] filed by Larry Bernard Brooks, Sr., Betty Ann Dergin and Sandpiper Residents Association [Service Date: 01/18/2023 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [22-5334] (Myles, Kimberly) [Entered: 01/18/2023 07:27 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1981977] submitted by Larry Bernard Brooks, Sr., Betty Ann Dergin and Sandpiper Residents Association [Service Date: 01/18/2023 ] [22-5334] (Myles, Kimberly) [Entered: 01/18/2023 07:12 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1981974] filed by Sandpiper Residents Association, Betty Ann Dergin and Larry Bernard Brooks, Sr. [Service Date: 01/18/2023 ] [22-5334] (Myles, Kimberly) [Entered: 01/18/2023 06:51 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1981975] filed by Kimberly Brown Myles and co-counsel Velimir Rasic; Laura Beshara; Michael M. Daniel on behalf of Appellants Larry Bernard Brooks, Sr., Betty Ann Dergin and Sandpiper Residents Association. [22-5334] (Myles, Kimberly) [Entered: 01/18/2023 07:03 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1981976] filed by Larry Bernard Brooks, Sr., Betty Ann Dergin and Sandpiper Residents Association [Service Date: 01/18/2023 ] [22-5334] (Myles, Kimberly) [Entered: 01/18/2023 07:09 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1978766] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-01783-RDM filed by Larry Bernard Brooks, Sr., Betty Ann Dergin and Sandpiper Residents Association. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-5334. [22-5334] [Entered: 12/22/2022 11:53 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1978768] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 01/23/2023. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 01/23/2023. APPELLANT statement of issues due 01/23/2023. APPELLANT underlying decision due 01/23/2023. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 01/23/2023. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 01/23/2023. APPELLANT transcript status report due 01/23/2023. APPELLANT procedural motions due 01/23/2023. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 02/06/2023; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 01/23/2023. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 01/23/2023. APPELLEE procedural motions due 01/23/2023. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 02/06/2023 [22-5334] [Entered: 12/22/2022 11:55 AM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-5334] [Entered: 12/22/2022 11:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
