Manetirony Clervrain, et al v. Patrick Mara, et al
| Manetirony Clervrain |
| Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu |
| Patrick Mara, Renee Mcdonald Hutchins, Tim Cook, Lashanda T. Adams, Joseph Cunningham, Ashley Carter Macleay, Andrew Desser, Celeste Biagini, Karl Von Batten, Brady Mickelson and Jared Sutton |
| 22-7035 |
| March 31, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1942491] received from illegible [signed for on 04/04/2022] for order [1941402-2] sent to Appellant Manetirony Clervrain [22-7035] [Entered: 04/11/2022 09:07 AM] |
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1941402] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 8649 6296] of order [ # 1941396-5 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 05/02/2022 from Manetirony Clervrain. [22-7035] [Entered: 03/31/2022 02:07 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1941396] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 05/20/2022. APPENDIX due 05/20/2022. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [22-7035] [Entered: 03/31/2022 01:59 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1941394] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-00273-UNA filed by Manetirony Clervrain. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-7035. [22-7035] [Entered: 03/31/2022 01:57 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-7035] [Entered: 03/31/2022 01:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
