Broidy Capital Management LLC, et al v. Nicolas Muzin, et al
| Broidy Capital Management LLC and Elliott Broidy |
| Nicolas D. Muzin, Joseph Allaham, Gregory Howard and Stonington Strategies LLC |
| State of Qatar |
| United States of America |
| 22-7082 |
| June 7, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Civil (Rico) |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Broidy Capital Management LLC v. Nicolas Muzin
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, U.S. District Court. [22-7082] [Entered: 04/18/2023 04:11 PM]
|
|
OPINION [1989462] filed (Pages: 25) for the Court by Judge Wilkins. [22-7082] [Entered: 03/10/2023 10:31 AM]
|
|
CLERK'S ORDER [1989463] filed withholding issuance of the mandate. [22-7082] [Entered: 03/10/2023 10:32 AM]
|
|
PER CURIAM JUDGMENT [1989461] filed that the appeal be dismissed and the case be remanded to the District Court for further proceedings, for the reasons in the accompanying opinion . Before Judges: Srinivasan, Wilkins and Rao. [22-7082] [Entered: 03/10/2023 10:28 AM]
|
|
TRANSCRIPT [1984709] of oral argument (For Internal Use Only: Transcript is only available to court staff) . [22-7082] [Entered: 02/06/2023 01:13 PM]
|
|
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD before Judges Srinivasan, Wilkins and Rao. [22-7082] [Entered: 10/28/2022 01:01 PM]
|
|
PER CURIAM ORDER [1970403] filed granting appellant's unopposed motion to modify the oral argument time allocation [ # 1969661-2 ], The following revised allocation of oral argument time will now apply: Appellant - 15 Minutes, Amicus Curiae - 10 Minutes, Appellees - 20 Minutes [22-7082] [Entered: 10/25/2022 11:02 AM]
|
|
FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, David M. Zionts, on behalf of Appellant State of Qatar (For Internal Use Only: Form is restricted to protect counsel's personal contact information) . [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 10/20/2022 04:32 PM]
|
|
UNOPPOSED MOTION [1969661] to allocate oral argument time filed by State of Qatar [Service Date: 10/19/2022 ] Length Certification: 528 Words. [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 10/19/2022 10:54 AM]
|
|
FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, Daniel R. Benson, on behalf of Appellees Broidy Capital Management LLC and Elliott Broidy (For Internal Use Only: Form is restricted to protect counsel's personal contact information) . [22-7082] (Benson, Daniel) [Entered: 10/19/2022 06:19 PM]
|
|
FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, Daniel A. Saunders, on behalf of Appellees Broidy Capital Management LLC and Elliott Broidy (For Internal Use Only: Form is restricted to protect counsel's personal contact information) . [22-7082] (Benson, Daniel) [Entered: 10/19/2022 06:21 PM]
|
|
PER CURIAM ORDER [1969403] filed granting the motion of the United States for leave to participate at oral argument as amicus curiae; allocating oral argument time as follows: Appellant - 10 Minutes, Amicus Curiae - 10 Minutes. Appellees - 20 Minutes; directing party to file Form 72 notice of arguing attorney by 10/20/2022 [22-7082] [Entered: 10/18/2022 10:25 AM]
|
|
CLERK'S ORDER [1969412] filed granting the motion of Daniel A. Saunders for leave to participate pro hac vice for oral argument [ # 1968839-2 ]. [22-7082] [Entered: 10/18/2022 10:45 AM]
|
|
FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, Martin Totaro, on behalf of Amicus Curiae USA (For Internal Use Only: Form is restricted to protect counsel's personal contact information) . [22-7082] (Totaro, Martin) [Entered: 10/18/2022 10:52 AM]
|
|
MOTION [1968839] For Leave To Appear Pro Hac Vice For The Limited Purpose Of Appearing And Arguing Upcoming Oral Argument filed by Broidy Capital Management LLC and Elliott Broidy (Service Date: 10/13/2022 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 150 words. [22-7082] (Benson, Daniel) [Entered: 10/13/2022 07:15 PM]
|
|
APPELLANT REPLY BRIEF [1966166] filed by State of Qatar [Service Date: 09/26/2022 ] Length of Brief: 7461 words. [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 09/26/2022 04:43 PM]
|
|
UNOPPOSED MOTION [1965395] to allocate oral argument time filed by USA [Service Date: 09/21/2022 ] Length Certification: 487. [22-7082] (Totaro, Martin) [Entered: 09/21/2022 04:31 PM]
|
|
CORRECTED APPELLEE BRIEF [1964569] filed by Broidy Capital Management LLC and Elliott Broidy [Service Date: 09/16/2022 ] Length of Brief: 14,989 words as permitted by Order. [22-7082] (Benson, Daniel) [Entered: 09/16/2022 01:45 PM]
|
|
CLERK'S ORDER [1963859] filed dismissing as moot appellant's unopposed motion to exceed word limits in the reply brief in light of the court's September 12, 2022 per curiam order that granted appellee's request to exceed the word limit of its brief along with the commensurate request to increase the word limit of appellant's reply brief by 1,000 words [ # 1963577-2 ]. [22-7082] [Entered: 09/14/2022 01:44 PM]
|
|
LETTER [1963239] sent to counsel concerning the use of uncommon acronyms and abbreviations in briefs. Nonconforming Briefs: [ # 1963217-2 ]. [22-7082] [Entered: 09/13/2022 08:18 AM]
|
|
UNOPPOSED MOTION [1963577] to exceed word limits in brief filed by State of Qatar [Service Date: 09/13/2022 ] Length Certification: 485 words. [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 09/13/2022 06:00 PM]
|
|
PER CURIAM ORDER [1962976] filed granting appellee's motion for leave to exceed word limits [ # 1962107-2 ]. [22-7082] [Entered: 09/12/2022 09:28 AM]
|
|
APPELLEE BRIEF [1963217] filed by Broidy Capital Management LLC and Elliott Broidy [Service Date: 09/12/2022 ] Length of Brief: 14,858 words by Order of the Court. [22-7082] (Benson, Daniel) [Entered: 09/12/2022 09:22 PM]
|
|
MOTION [1962107] to exceed word limits in brief filed by Broidy Capital Management LLC and Elliott Broidy (Service Date: 09/05/2022 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 489 Words. [22-7082] (Benson, Daniel) [Entered: 09/05/2022 10:18 PM]
|
|
AMICUS FOR APPELLANT BRIEF [1961136] filed by USA [Service Date: 08/26/2022 ] Length of Brief: This brief complies with the type-volume limit of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29(a)(5) because it contains 6394 words.. [22-7082] (Totaro, Martin) [Entered: 08/26/2022 07:31 PM]
|
|
PER CURIAM ORDER [1959621] filed denying appellant's consent motion to reschedule oral argument [ # 1959207-2 ]. This case remains scheduled for oral argument on October 28, 2022. [22-7082] [Entered: 08/16/2022 05:00 PM]
|
|
CONSENT MOTION [1959207] to reschedule oral argument filed by State of Qatar (Service Date: 08/12/2022 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 197 words. [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 08/12/2022 06:03 PM]
|
|
JOINT APPENDIX [1959205] filed by State of Qatar [Volumes: 1] [Service Date: 08/12/2022 ] [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 08/12/2022 05:55 PM]
|
|
APPELLANT BRIEF [1959204] filed by State of Qatar [Service Date: 08/12/2022 ] Length of Brief: 12,959 words. [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 08/12/2022 05:51 PM]
|
|
CLERK'S ORDER [1958912] filed scheduling oral argument on Friday, 10/28/2022. [22-7082] [Entered: 08/11/2022 11:50 AM]
|
|
NOTICE [1956692] to withdraw attorney Megan O'Neill who represented State of Qatar in 22-7082 filed by State of Qatar [Service Date: 07/27/2022 ] [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 07/27/2022 02:10 PM]
|
|
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1955041] filed by Martin Totaro and co-counsel Sharon Swingle on behalf of Amicus Curiae USA. [22-7082] (Totaro, Martin) [Entered: 07/14/2022 12:55 PM]
|
|
PER CURIAM ORDER [1954969] filed considering motion to expedite case [ # 1953973-2 ] It is ORDERED, on the courts own motion, that the United States Department of Justice be invited to file an amicus curiae brief addressing the views of the United States on this case, and in particular on whether this court has jurisdiction over this appeal and whether the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations and the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations protect from disclosure the documents that are the subject of discovery requests made by plaintiffs-appellees. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the following briefing schedule will apply in this case: Appellant's Brief due 08/12/2022. Joint Appendix due 08/12/2022. Department of Justice's Brief due 08/26/2022. Appelle Brief due on 09/12/2022. Appellant Reply Brief due 09/26/2022 Before Judges: Rogers, Millett and Wilkins. [22-7082] [Entered: 07/14/2022 09:31 AM]
|
|
REPLY [1954512] filed by Broidy Capital Management LLC and Elliott Broidy to response [ # 1954280-2 ] [Service Date: 07/12/2022 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 1,072. [22-7082] (Benson, Daniel) [Entered: 07/12/2022 11:56 AM]
|
|
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [1954280] to motion to expedite case [ # 1953973-2 ] filed by State of Qatar [Service Date: 07/11/2022 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 2,618 words. [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 07/11/2022 11:24 AM]
|
|
PER CURIAM ORDER [1954096] filed upon consideration of the emergency motion to expedite, it is ORDERED that the State of Qatar file a response to the emergency motion by 12:00 noon on Monday, July 11, 2022. Any reply is due by 12:00 noon on Tuesday, July 12, 2022. Before Judges: Rogers, Millett and Wilkins. [22-7082] [Entered: 07/08/2022 11:58 AM]
|
|
STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1953969] filed by State of Qatar [Service Date: 07/07/2022 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 07/07/2022 05:14 PM]
|
|
STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1953967] filed by State of Qatar [Service Date: 07/07/2022 ] [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 07/07/2022 05:12 PM]
|
|
EMERGENCY MOTION [1953973] to expedite case filed by Broidy Capital Management LLC and Elliott Broidy (Service Date: 07/07/2022 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 1663. [22-7082] (Benson, Daniel) [Entered: 07/07/2022 05:19 PM]
|
|
TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1953972] filed by State of Qatar [Service Date: 07/07/2022 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 07/07/2022 05:16 PM]
|
|
UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1953983] submitted by State of Qatar [Service Date: 07/07/2022 ] [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 07/07/2022 05:56 PM]
|
|
CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1953975] filed by Broidy Capital Management LLC and Elliott Broidy [Service Date: 07/07/2022 ] [22-7082] (Benson, Daniel) [Entered: 07/07/2022 05:23 PM]
|
|
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1953974] filed by Daniel R. Benson on behalf of Appellees Elliott Broidy and Broidy Capital Management LLC. [22-7082] (Benson, Daniel) [Entered: 07/07/2022 05:22 PM]
|
|
PER CURIAM ORDER [1953185] filed ORDERED that the emergency motion to stay be granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the cross-motion to dismiss be referred to the merits panel to which this appeal is assigned. The parties are directed to address in their briefs the issues presented in the motion to dismiss rather than incorporate those arguments by reference. Before Judges: Henderson, Wilkins and Katsas. [22-7082] [Entered: 07/01/2022 12:11 PM]
|
|
REPLY [1952595] filed by State of Qatar to response and RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION filed to Cross Motion [ # 1952065-3 ] [Service Date: 06/28/2022 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 3,897 Words. [22-7082]--[Edited 06/29/2022 by AH--MODIFIED EVENT] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 06/28/2022 03:46 PM]
|
|
CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1952066] filed by Broidy Capital Management LLC and Elliott Broidy [Service Date: 06/24/2022 ] [22-7082] (Benson, Daniel) [Entered: 06/24/2022 03:58 PM]
|
|
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [1952065] to motion to stay case [ # 1950964-2 ] combined with a MOTION to dismiss case filed by Elliott Broidy and Broidy Capital Management LLC [Service Date: 06/24/2022 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 7,355 words. [22-7082]--[Edited 06/27/2022 by AH--MODIFIED EVENT] (Benson, Daniel) [Entered: 06/24/2022 03:54 PM]
|
|
PER CURIAM ORDER [1951089] filed directing response to appellant's emergency motion to stay case [ # 1950964-2 ]. Any responses to the emergency motion are due by 4:00 p.m. on Friday, June 24, 2022. Any reply is due by 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, June 28, 2022. Before Judges: Henderson, Wilkins and Katsas. [22-7082] [Entered: 06/17/2022 05:25 PM]
|
|
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1950961] filed by David M. Zionts on behalf of Appellant State of Qatar. [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 06/16/2022 09:38 PM]
|
|
DOCKETING STATEMENT [1950962] filed by State of Qatar [Service Date: 06/16/2022 ] [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 06/16/2022 09:42 PM]
|
|
CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1950963] filed by State of Qatar [Service Date: 06/16/2022 ] [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 06/16/2022 09:44 PM]
|
|
EMERGENCY MOTION [1950964] to stay underlying order in case filed by State of Qatar (Service Date: 06/16/2022 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 5,145 Words. [22-7082] (Zionts, David) [Entered: 06/16/2022 09:57 PM]
|
|
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1949675] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-00150-DLF filed by State of Qatar. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-7082. [22-7082] [Entered: 06/07/2022 05:20 PM]
|
|
CLERK'S ORDER [1949678] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 07/07/2022. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 07/07/2022. APPELLANT statement of issues due 07/07/2022. APPELLANT underlying decision due 07/07/2022. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 07/07/2022. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 07/07/2022. APPELLANT transcript status report due 07/07/2022. APPELLANT procedural motions due 07/07/2022. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 07/22/2022; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 07/07/2022. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 07/07/2022. APPELLEE procedural motions due 07/07/2022. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 07/22/2022 [22-7082] [Entered: 06/07/2022 05:22 PM]
|
|
PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-7082] [Entered: 06/07/2022 05:20 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
