Denise Rogan Malmpy v. Broomall Operating Company LP, et al
| Denise A. Rogan Malmpy, Executrix of the Estate of Patricia A. Rogan, Deceased |
| Broomall Operating Company LP, Broomall Operating GP LLC, SavaSeniorCare Administrative and Consulting, LLC, SavaSeniorCare Consulting, LLC, SavaSeniorCare Administrative Services, LLC, Vincent Rupert, Jennifer Robinson and Elizabeth Marasco-Kennedy |
| John Does 1-5, Fictitious Defendant(s) |
| 22-7097 |
| July 6, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Medical Malpractice |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1958012] filed directing parties to file motions to govern future proceedings by 09/06/2022. [22-7095, 22-7096, 22-7097, 22-7098, 22-7099] [Entered: 08/05/2022 12:23 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1955435] filed by Deva A. Solomon on behalf of Appellants Broomall Operating Company LP, Broomall Operating GP LLC, Elizabeth Marasco-Kennedy, Jennifer Robinson, Vincent Rupert, SavaSeniorCare Administrative and Consulting, LLC, SavaSeniorCare Administrative Services, LLC and SavaSeniorCare Consulting, LLC in 22-7095, 22-7096, 22-7097, 22-7098, 22-7099. [22-7095, 22-7096, 22-7097, 22-7098, 22-7099] (Solomon, Deva) [Entered: 07/18/2022 02:09 PM] |
| NOTICE [1955470] for payment of docketing fee [Case Number 22-7095, 22-7096, 22-7097, 22-7098, 22-7099: pd] filed by Broomall Operating Company LP, Broomall Operating GP LLC, SavaSeniorCare Consulting, LLC, SavaSeniorCare Administrative Services, LLC, SavaSeniorCare Administrative and Consulting, LLC, Vincent Rupert, Jennifer Robinson and Elizabeth Marasco-Kennedy in 22-7095, 22-7096, 22-7097, 22-7098, 22-7099 [Service Date: 07/18/2022 ] [22-7095, 22-7096, 22-7097, 22-7098, 22-7099] (Solomon, Deva) [Entered: 07/18/2022 04:33 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1955131] filed by Adam R. Pulver and co-counsel Allison M. Zieve; Scott L. Nelson on behalf of Appellee Bernadette K. Battista in 22-7095, Appellee Kathleen M. Adorante in 22-7096, Appellee Denise A. Rogan Malmpy in 22-7097, Appellee Nadia Voorhees in 22-7098, Appellee Megan A. Allen in 22-7099. [22-7095, 22-7096, 22-7097, 22-7098, 22-7099] (Pulver, Adam) [Entered: 07/14/2022 05:42 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1953892] filed consolidating cases 22-7096, 22-7097, 22-7098, 22-7099 with 22-7095. Directing appellants to submit payment of each docketing fee by 07/18/2022. Directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT and APPELLEE entry of appearance due 07/18/2022. Holding cases in abeyance pending further order of the court. Cases 22-7095, et al., held in abeyance pending decision in 21-7067 and 21-7096 before this court. Motions to govern future proceedings due 30 days of court's disposition of the cases. [22-7095, 22-7096, 22-7097, 22-7098, 22-7099] [Entered: 07/07/2022 03:12 PM] |
| LETTER [1953888] sent regarding attorney membership to Christopher J. Culleton for Bernadette K. Battista in 22-7095, Kathleen M. Adorante in 22-7096, Denise A. Rogan Malmpy in 22-7097, Nadia Voorhees in 22-7098, and Megan A. Allen in 22-7099. Application for Admission due 08/08/2022. [22-7095, 22-7096, 22-7097, 22-7098, 22-7099] [Entered: 07/07/2022 02:57 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1953765] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 2:22-cv-00969-GAM filed by Broomall Operating Company LP, Broomall Operating GP LLC, Elizabeth Marasco-Kennedy, Jennifer Robinson, Vincent Rupert, SavaSeniorCare Administrative Services, LLC, SavaSeniorCare Administrative and Consulting, LLC and SavaSeniorCare Consulting, LLC. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-7097. [22-7097] [Entered: 07/06/2022 06:54 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-7097] [Entered: 07/06/2022 06:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
