John Ray v. CLH New York Ave, LLC, et al
| John L. Ray |
| CLH New York Ave, LLC, Richard Cohen, Donnie Hinton and Tony Lash |
| 22-7137 |
| October 13, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [1976902] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 01/17/2023. APPELLEE Brief due on 02/16/2023. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 03/09/2023. DEFERRED APPENDIX due 03/16/2023. Final Briefs due 03/30/2023. [22-7137] [Entered: 12/08/2022 02:52 PM] |
| NOTICE [1973949] to withdraw attorney Brian L. Schwalb who represented CLH New York Ave, LLC, Richard Cohen, Donnie Hinton and Tony Lash in 22-7137 filed by CLH New York Ave, LLC, Richard Cohen, Donnie Hinton and Tony Lash [Service Date: 11/16/2022 ] [22-7137] (Horowitz, Benjamin) [Entered: 11/16/2022 02:47 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [1973591] filed by John L. Ray [Service Date: 11/14/2022 ] [22-7137] (Temple, Donald) [Entered: 11/14/2022 05:06 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1973598] filed by John L. Ray [Service Date: 11/14/2022 ] [22-7137] (Temple, Donald) [Entered: 11/14/2022 05:34 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [1973601] submitted by John L. Ray [Service Date: 11/14/2022 ] [22-7137] (Temple, Donald) [Entered: 11/14/2022 05:36 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [1973590] filed by John L. Ray [Service Date: 11/14/2022 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [22-7137] (Temple, Donald) [Entered: 11/14/2022 05:06 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [1973600] filed by John L. Ray [Service Date: 11/14/2022 ] [22-7137] (Temple, Donald) [Entered: 11/14/2022 05:35 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1973589] filed by Donald M. Temple, Esq. and co-counsel J on behalf of Appellant John L. Ray. [22-7137] (Temple, Donald) [Entered: 11/14/2022 05:04 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [1973587] filed by John L. Ray [Service Date: 11/14/2022 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [22-7137] (Temple, Donald) [Entered: 11/14/2022 05:03 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [1973496] filed by Richard Cohen, Donnie Hinton, CLH New York Ave, LLC and Tony Lash [Service Date: 11/14/2022 ] [22-7137] (Horowitz, Benjamin) [Entered: 11/14/2022 01:52 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1968857] filed by Benjamin E. Horowitz on behalf of Appellees CLH New York Ave, LLC, Richard Cohen, Tony Lash and Donnie Hinton. [22-7137] (Horowitz, Benjamin) [Entered: 10/14/2022 09:53 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1968749] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-02841-RCL filed by John L. Ray. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 22-7137. [22-7137] [Entered: 10/13/2022 01:05 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1968784] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 11/14/2022. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 11/14/2022. APPELLANT statement of issues due 11/14/2022. APPELLANT underlying decision due 11/14/2022. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 11/14/2022. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 11/14/2022. APPELLANT transcript status report due 11/14/2022. APPELLANT procedural motions due 11/14/2022. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 11/28/2022; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 11/14/2022. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 11/14/2022. APPELLEE procedural motions due 11/14/2022. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 11/28/2022 [22-7137] [Entered: 10/13/2022 03:19 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [22-7137] [Entered: 10/13/2022 01:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
