Timothy SmithIn re: Timothy Smith
In re: Timothy Guy Smith |
22-8509 |
July 6, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1953693] with return receipt requested [Receipt No. 7020 2450 0000 9475 5815] of order [ # 1953691-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 08/05/2022 from Timothy Guy Smith. [22-8509] [Entered: 07/06/2022 02:34 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1953691] filed considering case opening document [ # 1953688-2 ] to show cause regarding disbarring attorney. Response to Order due 08/05/2022. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to respondent by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [22-8509] [Entered: 07/06/2022 02:30 PM] |
CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER received from Court of Appeals DC; Case Number: 20-BG-741; Date of Action: 06/24/2021; Type of Action: disbarment [Document: Timothy Guy Smith AD.pdf] [22-8509] [Entered: 07/06/2022 02:27 PM] |
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE CASE docketed. [22-8509] [Entered: 07/06/2022 02:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Timothy SmithIn re: Timothy Smith | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
In re: In re: Timothy Guy Smith | |
Represented By: | Timothy Guy Smith |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.