Utility Solid Waste Activities Group v. EPA, et al
| Utility Solid Waste Activities Group |
| Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency |
| 23-1036 |
| February 16, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CERTIFIED COPY [1986449] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1986447-2 ] [23-1036] [Entered: 02/17/2023 01:59 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1986514] filed consolidating cases 23-1036, 23-1037, 23-1038 (Consolidation started 02/17/2023) with 23-1035. Directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 03/20/2023. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 03/20/2023. PETITIONER statement of issues due 03/20/2023. PETITIONER underlying decision due 03/20/2023. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 03/20/2023. PETITIONER procedural motions due 03/20/2023. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 04/03/2023. RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 03/20/2023. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 03/20/2023. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 04/03/2023. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 04/03/2023 [23-1035, 23-1036, 23-1037, 23-1038] [Entered: 02/17/2023 04:24 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [23-1036] [Entered: 02/17/2023 01:50 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1986447] of a decision by federal agency filed by Utility Solid Waste Activities Group [Service Date: 02/16/2023] Disclosure Statement: Attached. [23-1036] [Entered: 02/17/2023 01:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.