Huntsman Petrochemical LLC, et al v. EPA
Huntsman Petrochemical LLC and American Chemistry Council |
Environmental Protection Agency |
23-1085 |
March 28, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK'S ORDER [1992165] filed granting motion for leave to intervene [ # 1870714-2 ] in 20-1414, 20-1417, granting motion for leave to intervene [ # 1870374-2 ] in 20-1414, 20-1417, 20-1418, granting motion for leave to intervene [ # 1870285-2 ] in 20-1414, 20-1417, 20-1418 [20-1414, 20-1417, 20-1418, 23-1085] [Entered: 03/28/2023 04:03 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1992152] filed granting motion for leave to intervene [ # 1991541-2 ] in 23-1045, 23-1047 [23-1045, 23-1047, 23-1085] [Entered: 03/28/2023 03:52 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1992131] filed upon consideration of EPAs unopposed motion to govern, it is ORDERED that the motion be granted. The Clerk is directed to sever Issues #1-3 in Huntsman Petrochemicals non-binding statement of issues in No. 20-1414, and Issues #1-6 in American Chemistry Councils non-binding statement of issues in No. 20-1418, assign them new docket No. 23-1085, and consolidate No. 23-1085 with No. 23-1045, et al. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties in No. 23-1045, et al., file a proposed briefing schedule by April 3, 2023. It is FURTHER ORDERED that No. 20-1414, et al., remain in abeyance pending further order of the court. The parties are directed to file motions to govern future proceedings in No. 20-1414, et al., by June 26, 2023. [20-1414, 20-1417, 20-1418, 23-1045, 23-1047, 23-1085] [Entered: 03/28/2023 03:21 PM] |
PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [23-1085] [Entered: 03/28/2023 03:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.