Tulsa Cement LLC, et al v. EPA, et al
Petitioner: Tulsa Cement LLC, d/b/a Central Plains Cement Company LLC and Republic Paperboard Company LLC
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Case Number: 23-1106
Filed: April 14, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2023 CLERK'S ORDER [1995090] filed consolidating cases 23-1115 (Consolidation started 04/17/2023) with 23-1102; directing party to file in 23-1115 initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 05/17/2023. PETITIONER statement of issues due 05/17/2023 [23-1102, 23-1115] [Entered: 04/17/2023 01:56 PM]
April 14, 2023 CLERK'S ORDER [1994926] filed consolidating cases 23-1105, 23-1103, 23-1106, 23-1107 (Consolidation started 04/14/2023) with 23-1102; directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 05/15/2023. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 05/15/2023. PETITIONER statement of issues due 05/15/2023. PETITIONER underlying decision due 05/15/2023. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 05/15/2023. PETITIONER procedural motions due 05/15/2023. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 05/30/2023; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 05/15/2023. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 05/15/2023. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 05/30/2023. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 05/30/2023 [23-1102, 23-1103, 23-1105, 23-1106, 23-1107] [Entered: 04/14/2023 04:19 PM]
April 14, 2023 CERTIFIED COPY [1994916] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1994912-2 ] [23-1106] [Entered: 04/14/2023 04:03 PM]
April 14, 2023 PETITION FOR REVIEW [1994912] of a decision by federal agency filed by Republic Paperboard Company LLC and Tulsa Cement LLC [Service Date: 04/14/2023 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached. [23-1106] [Entered: 04/14/2023 04:01 PM]
April 14, 2023 PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [23-1106] [Entered: 04/14/2023 03:57 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tulsa Cement LLC, et al v. EPA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tulsa Cement LLC, d/b/a Central Plains Cement Company LLC
Represented By: Megan H. Berge Esquire
Represented By: Jonathan Mark Little
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Republic Paperboard Company LLC
Represented By: Jonathan Mark Little
Represented By: Megan H. Berge Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Michael S. Regan, Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?