Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportat v. STB, et al
| Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority, d/b/a Metra |
| Surface Transportation Board and United States of America |
| 23-1131 |
| May 12, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [1999784] filed by Robert J. Wiggers and co-counsel Robert B. Nicholson on behalf of Respondent USA in 23-1125, 23-1131. [23-1125, 23-1131] (Wiggers, Robert) [Entered: 05/18/2023 10:53 AM] |
| AMENDED CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE [1999693] to case opening document of federal agency decision [ # 1999338-2 ] filed by Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority in 23-1131. [23-1131, 23-1125] (Pilsk, W.) [Entered: 05/17/2023 05:20 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1999511] filed consolidating cases 23-1131 (Consolidation started 05/16/2023) with 23-1125; directing party to file in 23-1125 initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 06/15/2023. PETITIONER statement of issues due 06/15/2023 [23-1125, 23-1131] [Entered: 05/16/2023 02:30 PM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [1999339] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 1999338-2 ] [23-1131] [Entered: 05/16/2023 08:08 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [1999338] of a decision by federal agency filed by Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority [Service Date: 05/12/2023 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached. [23-1131] [Entered: 05/16/2023 08:06 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [23-1131] [Entered: 05/16/2023 08:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
