Service Employees International Union v. NLRB
Service Employees International Union |
National Labor Relations Board |
23-1309 |
November 6, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CERTIFIED COPY [2025766] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 2025765-2 ] [23-1309] [Entered: 11/07/2023 02:19 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [2025767] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 12/07/2023. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 12/07/2023. PETITIONER statement of issues due 12/07/2023. PETITIONER underlying decision due 12/07/2023. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 12/07/2023. PETITIONER procedural motions due 12/07/2023. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 12/22/2023; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 12/07/2023. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 12/07/2023. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 12/22/2023. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 12/22/2023 [23-1309] [Entered: 11/07/2023 02:21 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2025821] filed by Dalford Dean Owens, Jr. and co-counsel Tyler J. Wiese and Christine Flack on behalf of Respondent NLRB. [23-1309] (Flack, Christine) [Entered: 11/07/2023 04:35 PM] |
PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [23-1309] [Entered: 11/07/2023 02:17 PM] |
PETITION FOR REVIEW [2025765] of a decision by federal agency filed by Service Employees International Union [Service Date: 11/06/2023 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached. [23-1309] [Entered: 11/07/2023 02:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.