USA v. James Trankle
| United States of America |
| James Albert Trankle, also known as John Davis |
| 23-3233 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2032799] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-cr-00675-TNM-1 filed by James Albert Trankle. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-3233. [23-3233] [Entered: 12/21/2023 10:43 AM] |
| CRIMINAL CASE docketed. [23-3233] [Entered: 12/21/2023 10:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. James Trankle | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Chrisellen Rebecca Kolb |
| Represented By: | USAO Appellate Counsel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: James Albert Trankle, also known as John Davis | |
| Represented By: | A. J. Kramer |
| Represented By: | John Louis Machado |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
