David Kissi v. DOJ
David Kissi |
United States Department of Justice |
23-5022 |
January 26, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
AMENDED SUPPLEMENT [1991470] to response [ # 1990652-2 ] filed by David Kissi [Service Date: 03/23/2023 ] [23-5022] [Entered: 03/23/2023 01:39 PM] |
SUPPLEMENT [1990993] to response [ # 1990652-2 ] filed by David Kissi [Service Date: 03/20/2023 ] [23-5022] [Entered: 03/21/2023 09:28 AM] |
AMENDED RESPONSE [1990652] to order [ # 1983297-5 ] filed by David Kissi (Service Date: 03/16/2023 by US Mail) Length Certification: 5 pages. [23-5022] [Entered: 03/17/2023 02:02 PM] |
SUPPLEMENT [1990492] to response [ # 1989913-2 ] filed by David Kissi [Service Date: 03/14/2023 ] [23-5022] [Entered: 03/16/2023 03:40 PM] |
LETTER [1990207] filed by David Kissi [Service Date: 03/15/2023 ] [23-5022] [Entered: 03/15/2023 11:51 AM] |
RESPONSE [1989913] to order [ # 1983297-5 ] filed by David Kissi (Service Date: 03/13/2023 by CM/ECF NDA, Clerk) Length Certification: 5 pages. [23-5022] [Entered: 03/13/2023 03:58 PM] |
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [1989435] received from illegible for order [1983302-2] sent to Appellant David Kissi [23-5022] [Entered: 03/10/2023 09:25 AM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [1983288] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:12-cv-01515-RBW filed by David Kissi. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-5022. [23-5022] [Entered: 01/26/2023 12:53 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1983296] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 02/27/2023, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [23-5022] [Entered: 01/26/2023 01:16 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [1983297] filed to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 02/27/2023. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order., Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [23-5022] [Entered: 01/26/2023 01:19 PM] |
CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1983302] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.70210350000199477366] of order [ # 1983297-2 ], [ # 1983296-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 02/27/2023 from David Kissi. [23-5022] [Entered: 01/26/2023 01:34 PM] |
US CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-5022] [Entered: 01/26/2023 12:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: David Kissi v. DOJ | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: David Kissi | |
Represented By: | David Kissi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: United States Department of Justice | |
Represented By: | R. Craig Lawrence |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.