Ronald Emrit v. Condoleezza Rice, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant / Appellee: Condoleezza Rice, Former Secretary of State and Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State
Case Number: 23-5063
Filed: March 24, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 16, 2023 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED [1999786] marked "return to sender, unclaimed, unable to forward". Certified Mail [1991713-2] had been sent to Party Ronald Satish Emrit. [23-5063] [Entered: 05/18/2023 11:04 AM]
May 9, 2023 PER CURIAM ORDER [1998506] filed that the court will dispose of the appeal without oral argument on the basis of the record and presentations in the briefs pursuant to Fed. R. App. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir.Rule 34(j). Before Judges: Wilkins, Katsas and Sentelle. [23-5063] [Entered: 05/09/2023 11:57 AM]
April 7, 2023 AMENDED APPELLANT BRIEF [1994096] filed by Ronald Satish Emrit [Service Date: 04/11/2023 ] Length of Brief: 8 pages. [23-5063] [Entered: 04/11/2023 09:16 AM]
April 5, 2023 NOTICE [1993459] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court to supplement record amended notice of appeal [23-5063] [Entered: 04/05/2023 04:24 PM]
March 24, 2023 APPELLANT BRIEF [1991851] filed by Ronald Satish Emrit [Service Date: 03/27/2023 ] Length of Brief: 8 pages. [23-5063] [Entered: 03/27/2023 01:06 PM]
March 24, 2023 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1991707] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:23-cv-00192-UNA filed by Ronald Satish Emrit. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-5063. [23-5063] [Entered: 03/24/2023 02:48 PM]
March 24, 2023 CLERK'S ORDER [1991711] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 05/15/2023. APPENDIX due 05/15/2023. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [23-5063] [Entered: 03/24/2023 02:52 PM]
March 24, 2023 CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1991713] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 8679 7088] of order [ # 1991711-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 04/24/2023 from Ronald Satish Emrit. [23-5063] [Entered: 03/24/2023 02:55 PM]
March 24, 2023 US CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-5063] [Entered: 03/24/2023 02:47 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ronald Emrit v. Condoleezza Rice, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Ronald Satish Emrit
Represented By: Ronald Satish Emrit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Condoleezza Rice, Former Secretary of State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Antony J. Blinken, Secretary of State
Represented By: Jane M. Lyons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?