Bishop Dewayne v. United States, et al
| Bishop Ruben Dewayne |
| United States, James Dimon, J.P. Morgan Mortgage Acquisition Corp., MERS, Inc. and Civil Action No. 1:22-cv-11634-FDS |
| 23-5090 |
| April 27, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Real Property Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED [2002288] marked "return to sender, unclaimed". Certified Mail [1996882-2] had been sent to Party Bishop Ruben Dewayne. [23-5090] [Entered: 06/06/2023 08:02 AM] |
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [1996882] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 8679 7293] of order [ # 1996881-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 05/30/2023 from Bishop Ruben Dewayne. [23-5090] [Entered: 04/27/2023 03:46 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1996881] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 05/30/2023. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [23-5090] [Entered: 04/27/2023 03:43 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1996872] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-03013-JMC filed by Bishop Ruben Dewayne. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-5090. [23-5090] [Entered: 04/27/2023 03:35 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-5090] [Entered: 04/27/2023 03:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
