Matthew Sherven v. USA, et al
| Matthew J. Sherven |
| United States of America, Central Intelligence Agency, William Burns, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, David Cohen, Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Vaughn Bishop, Former Deputy Director of the Central Intelligence Agency and Gina Haspel, Former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency |
| 23-5174 |
| August 7, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Statutes APA/Review Agency |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [2013602] received from Javier Sherven for order [2011240-2] sent to Appellant Matthew J. Sherven [23-5174] [Entered: 08/22/2023 01:48 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-5174] [Entered: 08/07/2023 02:20 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2011234] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:23-cv-02024-UNA filed by Matthew J. Sherven. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-5174. [23-5174] [Entered: 08/07/2023 02:21 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2011236] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 10/06/2023. APPENDIX due 10/06/2023, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [23-5174] [Entered: 08/07/2023 02:28 PM] |
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [2011240] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 9948 1691] of order [ # 2011236-5 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 09/06/2023 from Matthew J. Sherven. [23-5174] [Entered: 08/07/2023 02:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
