Jiemin Bai v. Matthew Graves, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jiemin Bai
Defendant / Appellee: Matthew M. Graves, U.S. Attorney and Jessie Kong Liu, Formerly U.S. Attorney for DC, In her both official and personal capacity
Case Number: 23-5191
Filed: August 24, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 10, 2023 MOTION [2021120] for summary affirmance filed by Matthew M. Graves and Jessie Kong Liu (Service Date: 10/10/2023 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 2,602 words. [23-5191] (Walker, Johnny) [Entered: 10/10/2023 05:03 PM]
September 26, 2023 CORRECTED MOTION [2018990] to schedule oral argument filed by Jiemin Bai (Service Date: 09/26/2023 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: I hereby certify that pursuant to the Honorable Clerk's instruction, this Motion, including all Certificates, was consisted of three pages, double spaced, totaling 450 of fewer words, in Roman Letters 14 Pt., pursuant to FRAP 27(d) and FRAP 32(a)(5). [23-5191]--[Edited 09/27/2023 by LMM] (Ye, Ning) [Entered: 09/26/2023 01:47 PM]
September 25, 2023 TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [2018756] filed by Jiemin Bai [Service Date: 09/25/2023 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [23-5191]--[Edited 09/25/2023 by LMM] (Ye, Ning) [Entered: 09/25/2023 01:48 PM]
September 25, 2023 STATEMENT OF ISSUES [2018757] filed by Jiemin Bai [Service Date: 09/25/2023 ] [23-5191] (Ye, Ning) [Entered: 09/25/2023 01:50 PM]
September 25, 2023 MOTION [2018784] to schedule oral argument filed by Jiemin Bai (Service Date: 09/25/2023 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: Roman Letters Pt 12, one page, 368 word count,. [23-5191] (Ye, Ning) [Entered: 09/25/2023 02:41 PM]
September 25, 2023 STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [2018755] filed by Jiemin Bai [Service Date: 09/25/2023 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [23-5191] (Ye, Ning) [Entered: 09/25/2023 01:45 PM]
September 25, 2023 UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [2018760] submitted by Jiemin Bai [Service Date: 09/25/2023 ] [23-5191] (Ye, Ning) [Entered: 09/25/2023 01:54 PM]
September 25, 2023 DOCKETING STATEMENT [2018753] filed by Jiemin Bai [Service Date: 09/25/2023 ] [23-5191] (Ye, Ning) [Entered: 09/25/2023 01:42 PM]
September 25, 2023 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2018749] filed by Jiemin Bai [Service Date: 09/25/2023 ] [23-5191] (Ye, Ning) [Entered: 09/25/2023 01:37 PM]
September 25, 2023 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2018750] filed by Ning Ye and co-counsel None on behalf of Appellant Jiemin Bai. [23-5191] (Ye, Ning) [Entered: 09/25/2023 01:40 PM]
September 21, 2023 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2018285] filed by Johnny H. Walker and co-counsel Jane M. Lyons on behalf of Appellees Matthew M. Graves and Jessie Kong Liu. [23-5191] (Walker, Johnny) [Entered: 09/21/2023 04:41 PM]
September 21, 2023 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2018286] filed by Matthew M. Graves and Jessie Kong Liu [Service Date: 09/21/2023 ] [23-5191] (Walker, Johnny) [Entered: 09/21/2023 04:42 PM]
August 24, 2023 NOTICE OF APPEAL [2014016] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-cv-00390-TSC filed by Jiemin Bai. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-5191. [23-5191] [Entered: 08/24/2023 02:37 PM]
August 24, 2023 CLERK'S ORDER [2014018] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 09/25/2023. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 09/25/2023. APPELLANT statement of issues due 09/25/2023. APPELLANT underlying decision due 09/25/2023. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 09/25/2023. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 09/25/2023. APPELLANT transcript status report due 09/25/2023. APPELLANT procedural motions due 09/25/2023. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 10/10/2023; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 09/25/2023. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 09/25/2023. APPELLEE procedural motions due 09/25/2023. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 10/10/2023 [23-5191] [Entered: 08/24/2023 02:40 PM]
August 24, 2023 US CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-5191] [Entered: 08/24/2023 02:36 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jiemin Bai v. Matthew Graves, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Jiemin Bai
Represented By: Ning Ye
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Matthew M. Graves, U.S. Attorney
Represented By: DOJ Appellate Counsel
Represented By: Jane M. Lyons
Represented By: Johnny Hillary Walker III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Jessie Kong Liu, Formerly U.S. Attorney for DC, In her both official and personal capacity
Represented By: DOJ Appellate Counsel
Represented By: Jane M. Lyons
Represented By: Johnny Hillary Walker III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?