Mercedes Petitfere v. Lloyd Austin, III
Mercedes Petitfere, U.S. Navy |
Lloyd J. Austin, III, The Honorable, Secretary of Defense |
23-5195 |
August 31, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other Statutes APA/Review Agency |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK'S ORDER [2019991] filed granting motion to extend time [ # 2019230-2 ]; extending Clerk order initial submissions for appellant/petitioner [ # 2014885-2 ] APPELLANT dispositive motions due 11/30/2023; extending Clerk order initial submissions for appellee/respondent [ # 2014885-3 ] APPELLEE dispositive motions due 11/30/2023 [23-5195] [Entered: 10/02/2023 02:48 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2019554] filed by Lowell V. Sturgill Jr. on behalf of Appellee Lloyd J. Austin, III. [23-5195] (Sturgill, Lowell) [Entered: 09/29/2023 10:20 AM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2019225] filed by Jeremy S. Simon and co-counsel Jane M. Lyons on behalf of Appellee Lloyd J. Austin, III. [23-5195] (Simon, Jeremy) [Entered: 09/27/2023 04:59 PM] |
CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2019226] filed by Lloyd J. Austin, III [Service Date: 09/27/2023 ] [23-5195] (Simon, Jeremy) [Entered: 09/27/2023 05:01 PM] |
UNOPPOSED MOTION [2019230] to extend time to file motion to 11/30/2023 filed by Lloyd J. Austin, III [Service Date: 09/27/2023 ] Length Certification: 215 Words. [23-5195] (Simon, Jeremy) [Entered: 09/27/2023 05:11 PM] |
UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [2018563] submitted by Mercedes Petitfere [Service Date: 09/24/2023 ] [23-5195] (Sheldon, David) [Entered: 09/24/2023 03:30 PM] |
STATEMENT OF ISSUES [2018562] filed by Mercedes Petitfere [Service Date: 09/24/2023 ] [23-5195] (Sheldon, David) [Entered: 09/24/2023 03:28 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [2018561] filed by Mercedes Petitfere [Service Date: 09/24/2023 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [23-5195] (Sheldon, David) [Entered: 09/24/2023 03:23 PM] |
CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2018557] filed by Mercedes Petitfere [Service Date: 09/24/2023 ] [23-5195] (Sheldon, David) [Entered: 09/24/2023 03:18 PM] |
STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [2018559] filed by Mercedes Petitfere [Service Date: 09/24/2023 ] Intent: AppxNotDeferred [23-5195] (Sheldon, David) [Entered: 09/24/2023 03:20 PM] |
DOCKETING STATEMENT [2018558] filed by Mercedes Petitfere [Service Date: 09/24/2023 ] [23-5195] (Sheldon, David) [Entered: 09/24/2023 03:20 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2018560] filed by David P. Sheldon on behalf of Appellant Mercedes Petitfere. [23-5195] (Sheldon, David) [Entered: 09/24/2023 03:22 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [2014878] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-01819-RCL filed by Mercedes Petitfere. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-5195. [23-5195] [Entered: 08/31/2023 11:11 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [2014885] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 10/02/2023. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 10/02/2023. APPELLANT statement of issues due 10/02/2023. APPELLANT underlying decision due 10/02/2023. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 10/02/2023. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 10/02/2023. APPELLANT transcript status report due 10/02/2023. APPELLANT procedural motions due 10/02/2023. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 10/16/2023. APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 10/02/2023. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 10/02/2023. APPELLEE procedural motions due 10/02/2023. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 10/16/2023 [23-5195] [Entered: 08/31/2023 11:21 AM] |
US CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-5195] [Entered: 08/31/2023 11:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.