Abdul Mohammed v. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, et al
Abdul Azeem Mohammed |
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Aetna Better Health of Illinois, Aetna Better Health Inc., Aetna Better Health Premier Plan MMAI Inc., Dan Finke, Zuri Campos and Jesus Doe |
23-5197 |
August 31, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [2019137] received from Abdul Mohammed for order [2015625-2] sent to Appellant Abdul Azeem Mohammed [23-5197] [Entered: 09/27/2023 01:08 PM] |
CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [2015625] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 9948 1349] of order [ # 2015558-5 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 10/10/2023 from Abdul Azeem Mohammed. [23-5197] [Entered: 09/07/2023 08:53 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [2015558] filed to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 10/06/2023. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [23-5197] [Entered: 09/06/2023 03:57 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [2015303] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:23-cv-01958-DLF filed by Abdul Azeem Mohammed. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-5197. [23-5197] [Entered: 09/05/2023 02:34 PM] |
US CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-5197] [Entered: 09/05/2023 02:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.