Lassana Magassa v. FBI
| Lassana Magassa |
| Federal Bureau of Investigation |
| 23-5235 |
| October 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Freedom of Information Act of 1974 |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2031602] filed by Lassana Magassa [Service Date: 12/14/2023 ] [23-5235] (Jump, Christina) [Entered: 12/14/2023 04:31 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [2031601] filed by Lassana Magassa [Service Date: 12/14/2023 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [23-5235] (Jump, Christina) [Entered: 12/14/2023 04:28 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [2031603] filed by Lassana Magassa [Service Date: 12/14/2023 ] [23-5235] (Jump, Christina) [Entered: 12/14/2023 04:32 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [2031604] filed by Lassana Magassa [Service Date: 12/14/2023 ] [23-5235] (Jump, Christina) [Entered: 12/14/2023 04:34 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [2031607] submitted by Lassana Magassa [Service Date: 12/14/2023 ] [23-5235] (Jump, Christina) [Entered: 12/14/2023 04:54 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [2031605] filed by Lassana Magassa [Service Date: 12/14/2023 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [23-5235] (Jump, Christina) [Entered: 12/14/2023 04:37 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2031600] filed by Christina A Jump and co-counsel Chelsea G. Glover; Samira S. Elhosary on behalf of Appellant Lassana Magassa. [23-5235] (Jump, Christina) [Entered: 12/14/2023 04:25 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2027567] filed by FBI [Service Date: 11/17/2023 ] [23-5235] (Walker, Johnny) [Entered: 11/17/2023 10:54 AM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2027566] filed by Johnny H. Walker and co-counsel Jane M. Lyons on behalf of Appellee FBI. [23-5235] (Walker, Johnny) [Entered: 11/17/2023 10:53 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2027377] filed considering response [ # 2027272-2 ]; discharging Clerk order to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction [ # 2022534-2 ]; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 12/18/2023. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 12/18/2023. APPELLANT statement of issues due 12/18/2023. APPELLANT underlying decision due 12/18/2023. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 12/18/2023. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 12/18/2023. APPELLANT transcript status report due 12/18/2023. APPELLANT procedural motions due 12/18/2023. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 01/02/2024; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 12/18/2023. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 12/18/2023. APPELLEE procedural motions due 12/18/2023. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 01/02/2024 [23-5235] [Entered: 11/16/2023 12:34 PM] |
| RESPONSE [2027272] to order [ # 2022534-2 ], [ # 2022534-3 ], [ # 2022534-4 ] filed by Lassana Magassa (Service Date: 11/15/2023 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 372 words. [23-5235] (Jump, Christina) [Entered: 11/15/2023 05:58 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2022532] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-01952-JMC filed by Lassana Magassa. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-5235. [23-5235] [Entered: 10/19/2023 08:41 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2022534] filed to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 11/20/2023. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [23-5235] [Entered: 10/19/2023 08:45 AM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-5235] [Entered: 10/19/2023 08:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
