USA v. Adrian Moon
United States of America |
Adrian Damico Moon, GBN Chosen One |
23-5240 |
October 20, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
FIRST CLASS MAIL RETURNED [2028394] marked "Return to sender, no mail receptacle". Mail had been sent to Party Adrian Damico Moon. [23-5240] [Entered: 11/22/2023 01:33 PM] |
AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL [2027186] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:23-cv-01972-BAH filed by Adrian Damico Moon. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-5240. [23-5240] [Entered: 11/15/2023 02:27 PM] |
FIRST CLASS MAIL RETURNED [2027908] marked "Return to sender, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward". Mail [2023773-2] had been sent to Party Adrian Damico Moon. [23-5240] [Entered: 11/20/2023 02:09 PM] |
NOTICE [2027842] filed by Adrian Damico Moon [Service Date: 11/20/2023 ] [23-5240] [Entered: 11/20/2023 11:52 AM] |
NOTICE [2027378] filed by Adrian Damico Moon [Service Date: 11/07/2023 ] [23-5240] [Entered: 11/16/2023 12:35 PM] |
NOTICE [2025682] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is granted [Case Number 23-5240: IFP] [23-5240] [Entered: 11/07/2023 10:17 AM] |
CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED [2026201] marked "return to sender, attempted - not known, unable to forward". Certified Mail [2023773-2] had been sent to Party Adrian Damico Moon. [23-5240] [Entered: 11/09/2023 02:47 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [2025208] filed referring motion ifp in district court [ # 2025195-2 ] to the district court for consideration. Case 23-5240 held in abeyance pending decision in 1:23cv1972 from U.S. District Court. The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the district court. [23-5240] [Entered: 11/03/2023 09:49 AM] |
CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [2025581] received from Albert [signed for on 10/31/2023] for order [2023773-2] sent to Appellant Adrian Damico Moon [23-5240] [Entered: 11/06/2023 03:49 PM] |
EMERGENCY MOTION [2025184] filed for miscellaneous relief by Adrian Damico Moon (Service Date: 11/03/2023 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 3 pages. [23-5240] [Entered: 11/03/2023 09:02 AM] |
MOTION [2025198] to appoint counsel filed by (Service Date: 11/03/2023 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 7 pages. [23-5240] [Entered: 11/03/2023 09:32 AM] |
MOTION [2025188] to commence impeachment filed by Adrian Damico Moon (Service Date: 11/03/2023 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 8 pages. [23-5240] [Entered: 11/03/2023 09:10 AM] |
MOTION [2025195] leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court filed by Adrian Damico Moon (Service Date: 11/03/2023 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 8 pages. [23-5240] [Entered: 11/03/2023 09:21 AM] |
CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [2023773] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 9948 2131] of orders [ # 2022847-5 ], [ # 2022859-5 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 11/27/2023 from Adrian Damico Moon. [23-5240] [Entered: 10/25/2023 03:12 PM] |
SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE OF APPEAL [2023635] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:23-cv-01972-BAH filed by Adrian Damico Moon. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-5240. [23-5240] [Entered: 10/25/2023 08:36 AM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [2022841] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:23-cv-01972-BAH filed by Adrian Damico Moon. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-5240. [23-5240] [Entered: 10/20/2023 09:08 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [2022847] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 11/20/2023. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [23-5240] [Entered: 10/20/2023 09:11 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [2022859] filed to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 11/20/2023. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [23-5240] [Entered: 10/20/2023 09:16 AM] |
CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [2022869] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 9948 2223] of order [ # 2022859-5 ], [ # 2022847-5 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 11/20/2023 from Adrian Damico Moon. [23-5240] [Entered: 10/20/2023 09:23 AM] |
US CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-5240] [Entered: 10/20/2023 09:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Adrian Moon | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: United States of America | |
Represented By: | Jane M. Lyons |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Adrian Damico Moon, GBN Chosen One | |
Represented By: | Adrian Damico Moon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.