Wye Oak Technology, Inc. v. Republic of Iraq, et al
Plaintiff / Appellee: Wye Oak Technology, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant: Republic of Iraq and Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Iraq
Case Number: 23-7009
Filed: January 26, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2023 NOTICE [1991114] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court to supplement record amended notice of appeal [23-7013, 23-7009] [Entered: 03/21/2023 03:05 PM]
March 21, 2023 CLERK'S ORDER [1991123] filed removing case from abeyance; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 04/20/2023. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 04/20/2023. APPELLANT statement of issues due 04/20/2023. APPELLANT underlying decision due 04/20/2023. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 04/20/2023. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 04/20/2023. APPELLANT transcript status report due 04/20/2023. APPELLANT procedural motions due 04/20/2023. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 05/05/2023; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 04/20/2023. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 04/20/2023. APPELLEE procedural motions due 04/20/2023. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 05/05/2023 [23-7009, 23-7013] [Entered: 03/21/2023 03:36 PM]
February 3, 2023 CLERK'S ORDER [1984485] filed consolidating cases 23-7013 (Cross-appeal started 02/03/2023) with 23-7009. [23-7009, 23-7013] [Entered: 02/03/2023 11:33 AM]
January 26, 2023 CLERK'S ORDER [1983267] filed holding case in abeyance. Case 23-7009 held in abeyance pending decision in 1:10cv1182-RCL from U.S. District Court. The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the district court. [23-7009] [Entered: 01/26/2023 11:52 AM]
January 26, 2023 NOTICE OF APPEAL [1983264] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:10-cv-01182-RCL filed by Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Iraq and Republic of Iraq. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-7009. [23-7009] [Entered: 01/26/2023 11:48 AM]
January 26, 2023 PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-7009] [Entered: 01/26/2023 11:46 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Wye Oak Technology, Inc. v. Republic of Iraq, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: Wye Oak Technology, Inc.
Represented By: Neal Kumar Katyal
Represented By: Patrick Michael Klemz
Represented By: Eric C. Rowe
Represented By: Matthew Scott Rozen
Represented By: Charles Allen Foster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Republic of Iraq
Represented By: Nowell Bamberger
Represented By: Boaz Simon Morag Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Iraq
Represented By: Nowell Bamberger
Represented By: Boaz Simon Morag Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?