Marga Pierre-Noel v. Bridges Public Charter School, et al
| Marga Pierre-Noel, "Ms. Pierre," on behalf of her minor child K.N. |
| Bridges Public Charter School and District of Columbia, A Municipal Corporation |
| 23-7057 |
| May 8, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Civil Rights Education |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Margda Pierre-Noel v. Bridges Public Charter School |
 Pierre-Noel v. Bridges Public Charter School
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [2006385] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 08/14/2023. APPENDIX due 08/14/2023. APPELLEE Brief(s) due on 09/13/2023. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 10/04/2023 [23-7057] [Entered: 07/05/2023 01:26 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2002646] filed by Lauren E. Baum on behalf of Appellee Bridges Public Charter School. [23-7057] (Baum, Lauren) [Entered: 06/07/2023 02:14 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2002647] filed by Bridges Public Charter School [Service Date: 06/07/2023 ] [23-7057] (Baum, Lauren) [Entered: 06/07/2023 02:15 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2002678] filed by DC [Service Date: 06/07/2023 ] [23-7057] (Girton, Jeremy) [Entered: 06/07/2023 04:42 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2002692] filed by Marga Pierre-Noel [Service Date: 06/07/2023 ] [23-7057] (Sibert, Charles) [Entered: 06/07/2023 07:22 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [2002693] filed by Marga Pierre-Noel [Service Date: 06/07/2023 ] [23-7057] (Sibert, Charles) [Entered: 06/07/2023 07:23 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2002694] filed by Charles Sibert and co-counsel Dara Gold, Charles Moran on behalf of Appellant Marga Pierre-Noel. [23-7057] (Sibert, Charles) [Entered: 06/07/2023 07:24 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [2002695] filed by Marga Pierre-Noel [Service Date: 06/07/2023 ] Intent: AppxNotDeferred [23-7057] (Sibert, Charles) [Entered: 06/07/2023 07:26 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [2002697] filed by Marga Pierre-Noel [Service Date: 06/07/2023 ] [23-7057] (Sibert, Charles) [Entered: 06/07/2023 07:30 PM] |
| TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [2002698] filed by Marga Pierre-Noel [Service Date: 06/07/2023 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - All transcripts needed for the appeal have been completed and received. [23-7057] (Sibert, Charles) [Entered: 06/07/2023 07:32 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [2002699] submitted by Marga Pierre-Noel [Service Date: 06/07/2023 ] [23-7057] (Sibert, Charles) [Entered: 06/07/2023 07:32 PM] |
| STATEMENT [2002701] with Disclosure Listing filed by Bridges Public Charter School [Service Date: 06/07/2023 ] [23-7057] (Baum, Lauren) [Entered: 06/07/2023 08:45 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2002066] filed by Jeremy R. Girton and co-counsel Thais-Lyn Trayer, Ashwin P. Phatak on behalf of Appellee DC. [23-7057] (Girton, Jeremy) [Entered: 06/05/2023 09:48 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-7057] [Entered: 05/08/2023 11:48 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [1998277] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:23-cv-00070-TNM filed by Marga Pierre-Noel. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-7057. [23-7057] [Entered: 05/08/2023 11:50 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [1998279] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 06/07/2023. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 06/07/2023. APPELLANT statement of issues due 06/07/2023. APPELLANT underlying decision due 06/07/2023. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 06/07/2023. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 06/07/2023. APPELLANT transcript status report due 06/07/2023. APPELLANT procedural motions due 06/07/2023. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 06/22/2023; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 06/07/2023. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 06/07/2023. APPELLEE procedural motions due 06/07/2023. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 06/22/2023 [23-7057] [Entered: 05/08/2023 11:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Marga Pierre-Noel v. Bridges Public Charter School, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Marga Pierre-Noel, "Ms. Pierre," on behalf of her minor child K.N. | |
| Represented By: | Dara A. Gold |
| Represented By: | Charles Alexander Sibert |
| Represented By: | Charles Moran Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Bridges Public Charter School | |
| Represented By: | Lauren Elizabeth Baum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: District of Columbia, A Municipal Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Caroline S. Van Zile |
| Represented By: | Jeremy Girton |
| Represented By: | Ashwin Pradyumna Phatak |
| Represented By: | Thais-Lyn Trayer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
