In re: Sealed Case
In re: Sealed Case |
23-7088 |
July 13, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
APPENDIX [2014654] filed by Appellant [Volumes: 1] [Service Date: 08/23/2023 ] [23-7088] [Entered: 08/30/2023 08:17 AM] |
APPELLANT BRIEF [2014653] filed by Appellant [Service Date: 08/23/2023 ] Length of Brief: 14,000 words. [23-7088] [Entered: 08/30/2023 08:15 AM] |
SUPPLEMENT [2013861] to motion ifp in this Court [2012728-2] filed by Appellant [Service Date: 08/23/2023 ] [23-7088] [Entered: 08/23/2023 04:01 PM] |
MOTION [2012728] to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [Case Number 23-7088: IFP Pending USCA] filed by Appellant (Service Date: 08/09/2023 by US Mail) Length Certification: 8 pages. [23-7088] [Entered: 08/16/2023 08:13 AM] |
PRISONER TRUST ACCOUNT REPORT [2012729] filed by Appellant [23-7088] [Entered: 08/16/2023 08:17 AM] |
PRISONER CONSENT TO COLLECTION [2012730] filed by Appellant [23-7088] [Entered: 08/16/2023 08:18 AM] |
RECEIPT [2012727] received from Appellant [signed for on 08/04/2023] for documents [2010495-6], [2010520-3], [2010523-5] sent to Appellant. [23-7088] [Entered: 08/16/2023 08:08 AM] |
LETTER [2010526] sent to warden sending Clerk orders [2010495-6], [2010520-3], [2010523-5]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 08/31/2023. [23-7088] [Entered: 08/01/2023 02:45 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [2010520] filed removing case from abeyance. [23-7088] [Entered: 08/01/2023 02:35 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [2010495] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court, prisoner trust account report, and consent to collection form due 08/31/2023. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [23-7088]--[Edited 08/02/2023 by SHA] [Entered: 08/01/2023 01:04 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [2010523] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 10/02/2023. APPENDIX due 10/02/2023. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [23-7088] [Entered: 08/01/2023 02:38 PM] |
NOTICE [2009453] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is denied [Case Number 23-7088: IFP Denied USDC] [23-7088] [Entered: 07/25/2023 01:34 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [2007747] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:23-cv-01313-UNA filed by Appellant. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-7088. [23-7088] [Entered: 07/13/2023 02:05 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [2007758] filed holding case in abeyance. Case 23-7088 held in abeyance pending decision in 1:23cv1313-UNA from U.S. District Court; The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the district court. [23-7088] [Entered: 07/13/2023 02:15 PM] |
PRIVATE PRISONER CASE docketed. [23-7088] [Entered: 07/13/2023 01:59 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Sealed Case | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
In re: In re: Sealed Case | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.