Eugene Hudson, Jr. v. American Federation of Government Employees
Eugene Hudson, Jr. |
American Federation of Government Employees |
23-7113 |
September 6, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Labor/Management Relations Act |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [2025162] to motion for summary affirmance [ # 2023446-2 ] filed by Eugene Hudson, Jr. [Service Date: 11/02/2023 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 5109. [23-7113] (Morten, Marlene) [Entered: 11/03/2023 12:11 AM] |
MOTION [2023446] for summary affirmance filed by American Federation of Government Employees (Service Date: 10/23/2023 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 2741 Words. [23-7113] (Sanghvi, Rushab) [Entered: 10/23/2023 10:16 PM] |
CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2020904] filed by American Federation of Government Employees [Service Date: 10/06/2023 ] [23-7113] (Sanghvi, Rushab) [Entered: 10/06/2023 11:28 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2020905] filed by Rushab Sanghvi on behalf of Appellee American Federation of Government Employees. [23-7113] (Sanghvi, Rushab) [Entered: 10/06/2023 11:29 PM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2020903] filed by Marlene (Kemi) Morten on behalf of Appellant Eugene Hudson, Jr.. [23-7113] (Morten, Marlene) [Entered: 10/06/2023 11:16 PM] |
DOCKETING STATEMENT [2020902] filed by Eugene Hudson, Jr. [Service Date: 10/06/2023 ] [23-7113] (Morten, Marlene) [Entered: 10/06/2023 11:14 PM] |
CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2020901] filed by Eugene Hudson, Jr. [Service Date: 10/06/2023 ] [23-7113] (Morten, Marlene) [Entered: 10/06/2023 10:46 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [2015531] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:19-cv-02738-JEB filed by Eugene Hudson, Jr.. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-7113. [23-7113] [Entered: 09/06/2023 02:55 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [2015534] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 10/06/2023. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 10/06/2023. APPELLANT statement of issues due 10/06/2023. APPELLANT underlying decision due 10/06/2023. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 10/06/2023. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 10/06/2023. APPELLANT transcript status report due 10/06/2023. APPELLANT procedural motions due 10/06/2023. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 10/23/2023. APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 10/06/2023. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 10/06/2023. APPELLEE procedural motions due 10/06/2023. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 10/23/2023 [23-7113] [Entered: 09/06/2023 02:56 PM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-7113] [Entered: 09/06/2023 02:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Eugene Hudson, Jr. v. American Federation of Government Employees | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Eugene Hudson, Jr. | |
Represented By: | Marlene D. Morten |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: American Federation of Government Employees | |
Represented By: | Rushab Sanghvi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.