Larry Klayman v. Julia Porter, et al
Larry Elliott Klayman |
Julia Porter, Hamilton P. Fox, III, Lawrence Bloom and Matthew G. Kaiser |
23-7120 |
September 22, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other Personal Injury |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
PER ABOVE ORDER lodged supplement [ # 2017666-2 ] is filed [22-7123, 23-7120] [Entered: 11/01/2023 05:02 PM] |
PER CURIAM ORDER [2024899] filed granting appellant's motion for leave to file a supplement to the initial brief and reply brief [ # 2018064-2 ]. The Clerk is directed to file supplemental [ # 2017666-2 ]. Before Judges: Millett, Rao and Rogers. [22-7123, 23-7120] [Entered: 11/01/2023 04:59 PM] |
PER CURIAM ORDER [2024696] filed denying motion to expedite proceedings [ # 2020152-2 ] denying motion to stay case [ # 2020152-3 ]. Before Judges: Millett, Rao and Rogers. [22-7123, 23-7120] [Entered: 10/31/2023 05:10 PM] |
DOCKETING STATEMENT [2023316] filed by Larry Elliott Klayman [Service Date: 10/23/2023 ] [23-7120] (Klayman, Larry) [Entered: 10/23/2023 02:46 PM] |
CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2023312] filed by Larry Elliott Klayman [Service Date: 10/23/2023 ] [23-7120] (Klayman, Larry) [Entered: 10/23/2023 02:43 PM] |
STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [2023319] filed by Larry Elliott Klayman [Service Date: 10/23/2023 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [23-7120] (Klayman, Larry) [Entered: 10/23/2023 02:48 PM] |
TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [2023323] filed by Larry Elliott Klayman [Service Date: 10/23/2023 ]. Status of Transcripts: Final - No transcripts are needed for the appeal. [23-7120] (Klayman, Larry) [Entered: 10/23/2023 02:54 PM] |
UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [2023324] submitted by Larry Elliott Klayman [Service Date: 10/23/2023 ] [23-7120] (Klayman, Larry) [Entered: 10/23/2023 02:56 PM] |
STATEMENT OF ISSUES [2023321] filed by Larry Elliott Klayman [Service Date: 10/23/2023 ] [23-7120] (Klayman, Larry) [Entered: 10/23/2023 02:50 PM] |
NOTICE [2023118] Filing Transcript filed by Larry Elliott Klayman in 22-7123, 23-7120 [Service Date: 10/20/2023 ] [22-7123, 23-7120] (Klayman, Larry) [Entered: 10/20/2023 03:50 PM] |
ORAL ARGUMENT HELD before Judges Millett, Rao and Rogers. [22-7123, 23-7120] [Entered: 10/16/2023 10:43 AM] |
REPLY [2021359] filed by Larry Elliott Klayman in 23-7120, 22-7123 to response [ # 2021167-2 ] [Service Date: 10/11/2023 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 1686 words. [23-7120, 22-7123] (Klayman, Larry) [Entered: 10/11/2023 04:30 PM] |
RESPONSE [2021167] to order and to motion [ # 2020157-2 ], [ # 2020152-2 ], [ # 2020152-3 ], [ # 2020152-4 ] filed by Lawrence Bloom, Hamilton P. Fox, III, Mr. Matthew G. Kaiser and Julia Porter in 22-7123, 23-7120 [Service Date: 10/10/2023 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 4,606 words. [22-7123, 23-7120] (MacDougall, Mark) [Entered: 10/10/2023 08:31 PM] |
FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, Larry Klayman, on behalf of Appellant Larry Elliott Klayman in 22-7123, 23-7120 (For Internal Use Only: Form is restricted to protect counsel's personal contact information) . [22-7123, 23-7120] (Klayman, Larry) [Entered: 10/09/2023 05:17 PM] |
FORM 72 submitted by arguing attorney, Lide E. Paterno, on behalf of Appellees Julia Porter, Hamilton P. Fox, III, Lawrence Bloom and Mr. Matthew G. Kaiser in 22-7123, 23-7120 (For Internal Use Only: Form is restricted to protect counsel's personal contact information) . [22-7123, 23-7120] (Paterno, Lide) [Entered: 10/09/2023 03:39 PM] |
PER CURIAM ORDER [2020752] filed allocating oral argument time as follows: Appellant - 10 Minutes, Appellee - 10 Minutes. One counsel per side to argue; directing party to file Form 72 notice of arguing attorney by 10/10/2023 [22-7123, 23-7120] [Entered: 10/06/2023 10:49 AM] |
PER CURIAM ORDER [2020157] filed granting motion to consolidate 23-7120 (Consolidation started 10/03/2023) with 22-7123. It is FURTHER ORDERED, on the courts own motion, that appellees file a response to the remainder of the motion by Tuesday, October 10, 2023. Any reply must be filed by Wednesday, October 11, 2023. Before Judges: Millett, Rao and Rogers. [22-7123, 23-7120] [Entered: 10/03/2023 10:37 AM] |
SUPPLEMENT [2019968] to motion to expedite case [ # 2019786-2 ], motion to stay case [ # 2019786-3 ] filed by Larry Elliott Klayman [Service Date: 10/02/2023 ] [23-7120] (Klayman, Larry) [Entered: 10/02/2023 02:18 PM] |
MOTION [2019786] to expedite case, to stay underlying order in case filed by Larry Elliott Klayman (Service Date: 09/29/2023 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 3009 words. [23-7120] (Klayman, Larry) [Entered: 09/29/2023 08:22 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [2018397] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-03109-RBW filed by Larry Elliott Klayman. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 23-7120. [23-7120] [Entered: 09/22/2023 12:20 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [2018419] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 10/23/2023. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 10/23/2023. APPELLANT statement of issues due 10/23/2023. APPELLANT underlying decision due 10/23/2023. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 10/23/2023. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 10/23/2023. APPELLANT transcript status report due 10/23/2023. APPELLANT procedural motions due 10/23/2023. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 11/06/2023. APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 10/23/2023. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 10/23/2023. APPELLEE procedural motions due 10/23/2023. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 11/06/2023. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [23-7120] [Entered: 09/22/2023 01:30 PM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [23-7120] [Entered: 09/22/2023 12:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.