State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
| State of Texas, Railroad Commission of Texas and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality |
| Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency |
| 24-1054 |
| March 8, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [2044044] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 04/08/2024. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 04/08/2024. PETITIONER statement of issues due 04/08/2024. PETITIONER underlying decision due 04/08/2024. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 04/08/2024. PETITIONER procedural motions due 04/08/2024. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 04/22/2024; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 04/08/2024. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 04/08/2024. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 04/22/2024. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 04/22/2024 [24-1054] [Entered: 03/08/2024 10:55 AM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [2044041] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 2044039-2 ] [24-1054] [Entered: 03/08/2024 10:50 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [2044039] of a decision by federal agency filed by Railroad Commission of Texas, State of Texas and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality [Service Date: 03/08/2024 ] Disclosure Statement: Not Applicable to this Party. [24-1054] [Entered: 03/08/2024 10:48 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [24-1054] [Entered: 03/08/2024 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
