Denka Performance Elastomer LLC v. EPA, et al
Denka Performance Elastomer LLC |
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael Regan, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency |
24-1135 |
May 16, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2055062] filed by Brandon N. Adkins on behalf of Respondents EPA and Michael Regan. [24-1135] (Adkins, Brandon) [Entered: 05/17/2024 01:56 PM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [2054938] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 06/17/2024. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 06/17/2024. PETITIONER statement of issues due 06/17/2024. PETITIONER underlying decision due 06/17/2024. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 06/17/2024. PETITIONER procedural motions due 06/17/2024. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 07/01/2024; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 06/17/2024. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 06/17/2024. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 07/01/2024. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 07/01/2024 [24-1135] [Entered: 05/16/2024 04:34 PM] |
CERTIFIED COPY [2054936] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 2054934-2 ] [24-1135] [Entered: 05/16/2024 04:29 PM] |
PETITION FOR REVIEW [2054934] of a decision by federal agency filed by Denka Performance Elastomer LLC [Service Date: 05/16/2024 ] Disclosure Statement: Attached. [24-1135] [Entered: 05/16/2024 04:20 PM] |
PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [24-1135] [Entered: 05/16/2024 04:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.