Mark Edwards v. PRC
| Mark Allen Edwards |
| United States Post Office and Postal Regulatory Commission |
| 24-1370 |
| November 27, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [2096068] to motion for other relief [ # 2093594-2 ] filed by United States Post Office [Service Date: 01/23/2025 by US Mail, CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 1,718 Words. [24-1370] (Weaver, Michael) [Entered: 01/23/2025 04:44 PM] |
| RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [2095778] to motion [ # 2093594-2 ] filed by PRC [Service Date: 01/22/2025 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 892 words. [24-1370] (Mittal, Urja) [Entered: 01/22/2025 05:50 PM] |
| REPLY [2095401] filed by United States Post Office to response [ # 2093591-2 ] [Service Date: 01/21/2025 by US Mail, CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 653 Words. [24-1370] (Weaver, Michael) [Entered: 01/21/2025 06:24 PM] |
| CERTIFIED INDEX TO RECORD [2094661] filed by PRC [Service Date: 01/16/2025 ] [24-1370] (Mittal, Urja) [Entered: 01/16/2025 09:08 PM] |
| CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED [2095315] marked "unclaimed". Certified Mail [2087585-2] had been sent to Party Mark Allen Edwards. [24-1370] [Entered: 01/21/2025 03:06 PM] |
| MOTION [2093594] for summary disposition filed by Mark Allen Edwards (Service Date: 01/13/2025 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 6 pages. [24-1370] [Entered: 01/13/2025 09:58 AM] |
| RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [2093591] to motion to terminate party in case [ # 2091218-2 ] filed by Mark Allen Edwards [Service Date: 01/13/2025 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 1 page. [24-1370] [Entered: 01/13/2025 09:57 AM] |
| PAYMENT OF DOCKETING FEE [2092220] received. Fee Amount: $600.00 Receipt Number: USCADC003028. [24-1370] [Entered: 01/02/2025 12:14 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING APPENDIX DEFERRAL [2092702] filed by Mark Allen Edwards [Service Date: 12/20/2024 ] Intent: AppxDeferred [24-1370] [Entered: 01/06/2025 12:06 PM] |
| UNDERLYING DECISION IN CASE [2092709] submitted by Mark Allen Edwards [Service Date: 12/20/2024 ] [24-1370] [Entered: 01/06/2025 12:14 PM] |
| STATEMENT OF ISSUES [2092704] filed by Mark Allen Edwards [Service Date: 12/20/2024 ] [24-1370] [Entered: 01/06/2025 12:09 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2092703] filed by Mark Allen Edwards [Service Date: 12/20/2024 ] [24-1370] [Entered: 01/06/2025 12:07 PM] |
| DOCKETING STATEMENT [2092698] filed by Mark Allen Edwards [Service Date: 12/31/2024 ] [24-1370] [Entered: 01/06/2025 11:47 AM] |
| CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE [2092406] filed by Mark Allen Edwards [Service Date: 01/03/2025 ] [24-1370] [Entered: 01/03/2025 09:29 AM] |
| MOTION [2091218] to terminate party, to intervene filed by United States Post Office (Service Date: 12/23/2024 by US Mail, CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 577 words. [24-1370] (Weaver, Michael) [Entered: 12/23/2024 02:35 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2091215] filed by Michael D. Weaver on behalf of Respondent United States Post Office. [24-1370] (Weaver, Michael) [Entered: 12/23/2024 02:12 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2090021] filed by Urja Mittal and co-counsel Michael S. Raab on behalf of Respondent PRC. [24-1370] (Mittal, Urja) [Entered: 12/17/2024 05:05 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2089212] filed granting motion to permit pro se electronic filing [ # 2087551-2 ] [24-1370] [Entered: 12/11/2024 05:56 PM] |
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [2087585] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 9947 3825] of order [ # 2087557-5 ], [ # 2087552-5 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 01/02/2025 from Mark Allen Edwards. [24-1370] [Entered: 12/03/2024 10:01 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2087557] filed directing party to file initial submissions: PETITIONER docketing statement due 01/02/2025. PETITIONER certificate as to parties due 01/02/2025. PETITIONER statement of issues due 01/02/2025. PETITIONER underlying decision due 01/02/2025. PETITIONER deferred appendix statement due 01/02/2025. PETITIONER procedural motions due 01/02/2025. PETITIONER dispositive motions due 01/17/2025; directing party to file initial submissions: RESPONDENT entry of appearance due 01/02/2025. RESPONDENT procedural motions due 01/02/2025. RESPONDENT certified index to record due 01/17/2025. RESPONDENT dispositive motions due 01/17/2025. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [24-1370] [Entered: 12/03/2024 09:23 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2087552] filed directing party to file payment of docketing fee PETITIONER payment of docketing fee due 01/02/2025; directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis PETITIONER motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court due 01/02/2025. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to petitioner by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [24-1370] [Entered: 12/03/2024 09:12 AM] |
| CERTIFIED COPY [2087549] of Petition for Review sent to respondent [ # 2087548-2 ] [24-1370] [Entered: 12/03/2024 08:59 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW [2087548] of a decision by federal agency filed by Mark Allen Edwards [Service Date: 11/27/2024 ] Disclosure Statement: Not Applicable to this Party. [24-1370] [Entered: 12/03/2024 08:59 AM] |
| MOTION [2087551] to permit pro se electronic filing status filed by Mark Allen Edwards (Service Date: 12/03/2024 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 1 page. [24-1370] [Entered: 12/03/2024 09:03 AM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [24-1370] [Entered: 12/03/2024 08:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.