Weih Chang v. USA, et al
Plaintiff: Weih Steve Chang
Defendant: United States of America, Christopher A. Wray, Director of Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity, Matthew G. Olsen, Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division and "China Initiative Working Group", U.S. Department of Justice, in his official capacity, John Does, Jane Doe, Squadron C, Federal Bureau of Investigation and Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States in his official capacity
Case Number: 24-5005
Filed: January 11, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2024 CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [2043678] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.70210350000199475362] of order [ # 2043660-2 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 04/05/2024 from Weih Steve Chang. [24-5005] [Entered: 03/06/2024 12:52 PM]
March 6, 2024 CLERK'S ORDER [2043660] filed considering Clerk order ifp motion or docket fee [ # 2035322-2 ]; to show cause regarding dismissing case. Response to Order due 04/05/2024. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order., Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [24-5005] [Entered: 03/06/2024 12:06 PM]
March 1, 2024 SUPPLEMENT [2043009] to motion for summary affirmance [ # 2042391-2 ] filed by Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Jane Doe, John Does, Matthew G. Olsen, USA and Christopher A. Wray [Service Date: 03/01/2024 ] [24-5005] (Littman, M. Jared) [Entered: 03/01/2024 09:14 AM]
February 26, 2024 MOTION [2042391] for summary affirmance filed by Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Jane Doe, John Does, Matthew G. Olsen, USA and Christopher A. Wray (Service Date: 02/26/2024 by US Mail, Email, CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 4883 Words. [24-5005] (Littman, M. Jared) [Entered: 02/26/2024 06:07 PM]
February 14, 2024 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURNED [2041523] marked "RTS Unclaimed". Certified Mail [2035324-2] had been sent to Party Mr. Weih Steve Chang. [24-5005] [Entered: 02/21/2024 11:45 AM]
February 12, 2024 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS AND RELATED CASES [2039953] filed by Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Jane Doe, John Does, Matthew G. Olsen, USA and Christopher A. Wray [Service Date: 02/12/2024 ] [24-5005] (Littman, M. Jared) [Entered: 02/12/2024 02:49 PM]
February 12, 2024 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2039951] filed by M. Jared Littman and co-counsel Jane M. Lyons on behalf of Appellees Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Jane Doe, John Does, Matthew G. Olsen, USA and Christopher A. Wray. [24-5005] (Littman, M. Jared) [Entered: 02/12/2024 02:47 PM]
January 11, 2024 NOTICE OF APPEAL [2035320] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-00352-RBW filed by Mr. Weih Steve Chang. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-5005. [24-5005] [Entered: 01/11/2024 09:06 AM]
January 11, 2024 CLERK'S ORDER [2035322] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 02/12/2024. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [24-5005] [Entered: 01/11/2024 09:14 AM]
January 11, 2024 CLERK'S ORDER [2035323] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 02/12/2024. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 02/12/2024. APPELLANT statement of issues due 02/12/2024. APPELLANT underlying decision due 02/12/2024. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 02/12/2024. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 02/12/2024. APPELLANT transcript status report due 02/12/2024. APPELLANT procedural motions due 02/12/2024. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 02/26/2024; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 02/12/2024. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 02/12/2024. APPELLEE procedural motions due 02/12/2024. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 02/26/2024. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [24-5005] [Entered: 01/11/2024 09:17 AM]
January 11, 2024 CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [2035324] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 9947 5515] of orders [ # 2035323-6 ], [ # 2035322-5 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 02/12/2024 from Weih Steve Chang. [24-5005] [Entered: 01/11/2024 09:24 AM]
January 11, 2024 US CIVIL CASE docketed. [24-5005] [Entered: 01/11/2024 08:58 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Weih Chang v. USA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Weih Steve Chang
Represented By: Weih Steve Chang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Jane M. Lyons
Represented By: M. Jared Littman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher A. Wray, Director of Federal Bureau of Investigation, in his official capacity
Represented By: Jane M. Lyons
Represented By: M. Jared Littman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Matthew G. Olsen, Assistant Attorney General, National Security Division and "China Initiative Working Group", U.S. Department of Justice, in his official capacity
Represented By: Jane M. Lyons
Represented By: M. Jared Littman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Represented By: Jane M. Lyons
Represented By: M. Jared Littman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jane Doe, Squadron C, Federal Bureau of Investigation
Represented By: Jane M. Lyons
Represented By: M. Jared Littman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States in his official capacity
Represented By: Jane M. Lyons
Represented By: M. Jared Littman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?