Michael Bullock v. Hana Security Services, et al
| Michael Bullock |
| Hana Security Services, Sam Estes, Regional Manager, Ronald Best, Contract Manager - IRS/DC, Michael Radford, DHS- Division Director and Security, Police, and Fire Professionals of America, SPFPA |
| 24-5055 |
| March 19, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Assault, Libel, and Slander |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [2045675] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7020 2450 0000 9475 3583] of order [ # 2045667-5 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 04/18/2024 from Michael Bullock. [24-5055] [Entered: 03/19/2024 02:08 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2045667] filed to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 04/18/2024. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [24-5055] [Entered: 03/19/2024 01:59 PM] |
| LETTER [2045636] sent regarding attorney membership to Brad S. Miller for Hana Security Services, Sam Estes and Ronald Best. Application for Admission due 04/18/2024. [24-5055] [Entered: 03/19/2024 11:35 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2045632] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-02608-DLF filed by Michael Bullock. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-5055. [24-5055] [Entered: 03/19/2024 11:26 AM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [24-5055] [Entered: 03/19/2024 11:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
