Timothy Young v. Merrick Garland, et al
| Timothy Doyle Young |
| Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Michael Evan Horowitz, Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice and United States of America |
| 24-5058 |
| March 21, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DUPLICATE NOTICE OF APPEAL [2050128] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:23-cv-02311-UNA filed by Timothy Doyle Young. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-5058. [24-5058] [Entered: 04/18/2024 09:11 AM] |
| LETTER [2046045] sent to warden sending Clerk order [ # 2046033-5 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 04/22/2024. [24-5058] [Entered: 03/21/2024 12:25 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2046033] filed to show cause regarding payment of docketing fee. Response to Order due 04/22/2024. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [24-5058] [Entered: 03/21/2024 12:01 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2046031] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:23-cv-02311-UNA filed by Timothy Doyle Young. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-5058. [24-5058] [Entered: 03/21/2024 11:58 AM] |
| US PRISONER CASE docketed. [24-5058] [Entered: 03/21/2024 11:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
