Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. USA, et al
| Michael S. Gorbey |
| United States of America, (i.e. Federal Judges), Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Administration FBOP Grand Prairie Texas Designation Center, Warden (Victorville USP), USP Victorville Cal., Captain Gore, USP Victorville Cal., John Doe, SIS, USP Victorville Cal., Jane Doe, SIS, USP Victorville Cal., Eseasilla, Mr., 2-B Unit Counselor, USP Victorville Cal. and Allen, Mrs., 2-B Unit Manager, USP Victorville Cal. |
| 24-5077 |
| April 9, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| LETTER [2048809] sent to warden sending Clerk order of docketing fee payment [ # 2048804-2 ]. Prisoner acknowledgment of receipt from Warden due 05/09/2024. [24-5077] [Entered: 04/09/2024 12:03 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2048804] filed to show cause regarding payment of docketing fee. Response to Order due 05/09/2024. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order., Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to send this order to appellant by whatever means necessary to ensure receipt. [24-5077] [Entered: 04/09/2024 11:44 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2048798] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:23-cv-03795-UNA filed by Michael S. Gorbey. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-5077. [24-5077] [Entered: 04/09/2024 11:34 AM] |
| US PRISONER CASE docketed. [24-5077] [Entered: 04/09/2024 11:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
