Sealed CaseIn re: Sealed Case
In re: Sealed Case |
24-5089 |
April 17, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK'S ORDER [2050173] filed considering motion to expedite case [2050136-2], setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 05/14/2024. APPENDIX due 05/14/2024. APPELLEE Brief due on 07/12/2024. APPELLANT Reply Brief due 08/09/2024 [24-5089] [Entered: 04/18/2024 11:40 AM] |
CONSENT MOTION [2050136] to expedite briefing schedule filed by Appellant (Service Date: 04/17/2024 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 2,936 words. [24-5089] [Entered: 04/18/2024 09:36 AM] |
ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2050133] filed by Appellant. [24-5089] [Entered: 04/18/2024 09:27 AM] |
SEALED NOTICE OF APPEAL [2050073] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:24-mc-00007-JEB filed by Appellant. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-5089. [24-5089] [Entered: 04/17/2024 04:28 PM] |
US CIVIL CASE docketed. [24-5089] [Entered: 04/17/2024 04:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Sealed CaseIn re: Sealed Case | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Not yet classified: In re: Sealed Case | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.