Shiva Ayyadurai v. Merrick Garland, et al
Plaintiff: Shiva Ayyadurai, Dr.
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland, In His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States and Gary Thompson, District of Columbia, Board of Elections
Case Number: 24-5133
Filed: May 15, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2024 CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [2054570] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 9947 2668] of order [ # 2054563-5 ], [ # 2054564-6 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 06/14/2024 from Shiva Ayyadurai. [24-5133] [Entered: 05/15/2024 12:22 PM]
May 15, 2024 CLERK'S ORDER [2054564] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 06/14/2024. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 06/14/2024. APPELLANT statement of issues due 06/14/2024. APPELLANT underlying decision due 06/14/2024. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 06/14/2024. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 06/14/2024. APPELLANT transcript status report due 06/14/2024. APPELLANT procedural motions due 06/14/2024. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 07/01/2024. APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 06/14/2024. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 06/14/2024. APPELLEE procedural motions due 06/14/2024. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 07/01/2024. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [24-5133] [Entered: 05/15/2024 12:05 PM]
May 15, 2024 CLERK'S ORDER [2054563] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 06/14/2024. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [24-5133] [Entered: 05/15/2024 12:01 PM]
May 15, 2024 NOTICE OF APPEAL [2054544] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:23-cv-02079-LLA filed by Shiva Ayyadurai. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-5133. [24-5133] [Entered: 05/15/2024 11:26 AM]
May 15, 2024 US CIVIL CASE docketed. [24-5133] [Entered: 05/15/2024 11:22 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Shiva Ayyadurai v. Merrick Garland, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shiva Ayyadurai, Dr.
Represented By: Shiva Ayyadurai
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Merrick B. Garland, In His Official Capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Represented By: Jane M. Lyons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gary Thompson, District of Columbia, Board of Elections
Represented By: Caroline S. Van Zile
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?