National Parks Conservation Association v. DOI, et al
| National Parks Conservation Association |
| United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Charles F. Sams, III, in his Official Capacity as Director of the National Park Service and Debra A. Haaland, in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior |
| 24-5147 |
| May 30, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Environmental Matters |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [2057020] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 07/01/2024. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 07/01/2024. APPELLANT statement of issues due 07/01/2024. APPELLANT underlying decision due 07/01/2024. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 07/01/2024. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 07/01/2024. APPELLANT transcript status report due 07/01/2024. APPELLANT procedural motions due 07/01/2024. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 07/15/2024; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 07/01/2024. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 07/01/2024. APPELLEE procedural motions due 07/01/2024. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 07/15/2024 [24-5147] [Entered: 05/30/2024 12:43 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2057013] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:20-cv-03706-RC filed by Debra A. Haaland, NPS, Charles F. Sams, III and DOI. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-5147. [24-5147] [Entered: 05/30/2024 12:28 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [24-5147] [Entered: 05/30/2024 12:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
