Bahig Bishay v. Trevor McFadden, et al
| Bahig F. Bishay, Private Attorney General |
| Gregory George Katsas, Solely in individual capacity, Justin Reed Walker, Solely in individual capacity, Trevor Neil McFadden, Solely in individual capacity, Cornelia T.L. Pillard, Solely in individual capacity, Robert Leon Wilkins, Solely in individual capacity, Harry T. Edwards, Solely in individual capacity, Srikanth Srinivasan, Solely in individual capacity, Bradley N. Garcia, Solely in individual capacity, Douglas H. Ginsburg, Solely in individual capacity, Patricia Ann Millett, Solely in individual capacity, Judith W. Rogers, Solely in individual capacity, Florence Y. Pan, Solely in individual capacity, J. Michelle Childs, Solely in individual capacity, A. Raymond Randolph, Solely in individual capacity and Neomi Rao, Solely in individual capacity |
| 24-5197 |
| August 30, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCKETING STATEMENT AND TRANSCRIPT STATUS REPORT [2081544] filed by Bahig F. Bishay [Service Date: 10/23/2024 ] [24-5197]--[Edited 10/23/2024 by EMT] (Bishay, Bahig) [Entered: 10/23/2024 01:06 PM] |
| MOTION [2077765] for leave to accept appendix filed by Bahig F. Bishay [Service Date: 10/02/2024] [24-5197]--[Edited 10/02/2024 by EMT] (Bishay, Bahig) [Entered: 10/02/2024 09:07 AM] |
| MOTION [2077164] to certify question of law filed by Bahig F. Bishay (Service Date: 09/27/2024 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: This document complies with Rule 35(b)(2) in all aspects and countable words, totaling 1,201 words. This document complies with the typeface requirements of Fed.R.App.P. 32(a)(5) and the type-style requirements of Fed.R.App.32(a)(6).. [24-5197] (Bishay, Bahig) [Entered: 09/27/2024 01:58 PM] |
| APPELLANT BRIEF [2077169] lodged by Bahig F. Bishay [Service Date: 09/27/2024 ] Length of Brief: This document complies with Rule 35(b)(2), except for word count which exceeds 13,000 words by 5,724, and respectfully request that this document be accepted for docketing because the within matter involves more than 70 parties and multiple courts.. [24-5197]--[Edited 09/27/2024 by EMT--MODIFIED EVENT FROM FILED TO LODGED] (Bishay, Bahig) [Entered: 09/27/2024 02:08 PM] |
| APPENDIX [2077170] filed by Bahig F. Bishay [Volumes: 1] [Service Date: 09/27/2024 ] [24-5197] (Bishay, Bahig) [Entered: 09/27/2024 02:10 PM] |
| MOTION [2077222] to exceed word limits in brief filed by Bahig F. Bishay (Service Date: 09/27/2024 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: This document complies with Rule 35(b)(2) in all aspects and countable words, totaling 329 words. This document complies with the typeface requirements of Fed.R.App.P. 32(a)(5) and the type-style requirements of Fed.R.App.32(a)(6).. [24-5197] (Bishay, Bahig) [Entered: 09/27/2024 09:00 PM] |
| NOTICE [2074458] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court for payment of docketing fee [Case Number 24-5197: Fee Paid] [24-5197] [Entered: 09/12/2024 03:05 PM] |
| MOTION [2074006] to certify questions to the Supreme Court filed by Bahig F. Bishay [Service Date: 09/10/2024 ] [24-5197]--[Edited 09/10/2024 by EMT] (Bishay, Bahig) [Entered: 09/10/2024 10:39 AM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [24-5197] [Entered: 08/30/2024 12:46 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2072573] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:24-cv-02086-APM filed by Bahig F. Bishay. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-5197. [24-5197] [Entered: 08/30/2024 01:06 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2072602] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 09/30/2024. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. [24-5197] [Entered: 08/30/2024 01:57 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2072604] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 10/21/2024. APPENDIX due 10/21/2024. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. [24-5197] [Entered: 08/30/2024 02:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
