Ruby Freeman, et al v. Rudolph Giuliani
Plaintiff: Ruby Freeman and Wandrea' Moss
Defendant: Rudolph W. Giuliani
Case Number: 24-7021
Filed: February 22, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Assault, Libel, and Slander
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2024 NOTICE [2050204] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court to supplement record denying defendant's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law [24-7021] [Entered: 04/18/2024 01:21 PM]
April 18, 2024 CLERK'S ORDER [2050207] filed removing case from abeyance; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT statement of issues due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT underlying decision due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT transcript status report due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT procedural motions due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 06/03/2024; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 05/20/2024. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 05/20/2024. APPELLEE procedural motions due 05/20/2024. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 06/03/2024 [24-7021] [Entered: 04/18/2024 01:25 PM]
February 23, 2024 LETTER [2042035] regarding case status filed by Ruby Freeman and Wandrea' Moss [Service Date: 02/23/2024 ] [24-7021] (Gottlieb, Michael) [Entered: 02/23/2024 11:48 AM]
February 22, 2024 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2041904] filed by Michael J. Gottlieb and co-counsel Meryl C. Governski and Aaron E. Nathan on behalf of Appellees Ruby Freeman and Wandrea' Moss. [24-7021] (Gottlieb, Michael) [Entered: 02/22/2024 04:35 PM]
February 22, 2024 NOTICE OF APPEAL [2041805] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-cv-03354-BAH filed by Rudolph W. Giuliani. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-7021. [24-7021] [Entered: 02/22/2024 12:27 PM]
February 22, 2024 CLERK'S ORDER [2041813] filed holding case in abeyance. Case 24-7021 held in abeyance pending decision in 1:21cv3354-BAH from U.S. District Court; The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the district court. [24-7021] [Entered: 02/22/2024 12:47 PM]
February 22, 2024 PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [24-7021] [Entered: 02/22/2024 12:26 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ruby Freeman, et al v. Rudolph Giuliani
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ruby Freeman
Represented By: Michael Julian Gottlieb
Represented By: Meryl Conant Governski
Represented By: Aaron Edgar Nathan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wandrea' Moss
Represented By: Michael Julian Gottlieb
Represented By: Aaron Edgar Nathan
Represented By: Meryl Conant Governski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rudolph W. Giuliani
Represented By: Joseph D. Sibley IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?