Amaplat Mauritius Ltd., et al v. Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation, et al
| Amaplat Mauritius Ltd. and Amari Nickel Holdings Zimbabwe Ltd. |
| Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation, Chief Mining Commissioner, Ministry of Mines of Zimbabwe and Republic of Zimbabwe |
| 24-7030 |
| March 11, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Statutes Arbitration |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [2044345] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 04/10/2024. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 04/10/2024. APPELLANT statement of issues due 04/10/2024. APPELLANT underlying decision due 04/10/2024. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 04/10/2024. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 04/10/2024. APPELLANT transcript status report due 04/10/2024. APPELLANT procedural motions due 04/10/2024. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 04/25/2024. APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 04/10/2024. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 04/10/2024. APPELLEE procedural motions due 04/10/2024. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 04/25/2024 [24-7030] [Entered: 03/11/2024 12:28 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2044339] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:22-cv-00058-CRC filed by Chief Mining Commissioner, Ministry Of Mines Of Zimbabwe, Republic of Zimbabwe and Zimbabwe Mining Development Corporation. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-7030. [24-7030] [Entered: 03/11/2024 12:18 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [24-7030] [Entered: 03/11/2024 12:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
