David De Csepel, et al v. Republic of Hungary, et al
David L. De Csepel, Angela Maria Herzog and Julia Alice Herzog |
Republic of Hungary, a foreign state, Hungarian National Gallery, Museum of Fine Arts, Museum of Applied Arts, Budapest University of Technology and Economics and Magyar Nemzeti Vagyonkezel Zrt., MNV or Hungarian National Asset Management Inc. in English |
24-7045 |
April 11, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other Personal Property Damage |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK'S ORDER [2049166] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 05/13/2024. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 05/13/2024. APPELLANT statement of issues due 05/13/2024. APPELLANT underlying decision due 05/13/2024. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 05/13/2024. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 05/13/2024. APPELLANT transcript status report due 05/13/2024. APPELLANT procedural motions due 05/13/2024. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 05/28/2024; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 05/13/2024. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 05/13/2024. APPELLEE procedural motions due 05/13/2024. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 05/28/2024 [24-7045] [Entered: 04/11/2024 12:48 PM] |
NOTICE OF APPEAL [2049163] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:10-cv-01261-JDB filed by David L. De Csepel, Angela Maria Herzog and Julia Alice Herzog. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-7045. [24-7045] [Entered: 04/11/2024 12:44 PM] |
PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [24-7045] [Entered: 04/11/2024 12:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.