Stacia Hall, et al v. District of Columbia Board of Elections
| Stacia Hall, Ralph Chittams, Suzzanne Keller, Ken McClenton, Kimberly Epps, Dick Anthony Heller and Nicolle S. A. Lyon |
| District of Columbia Board of Elections |
| 24-7050 |
| April 18, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK'S ORDER [2050124] filed directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLANT docketing statement due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT certificate as to parties due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT statement of issues due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT underlying decision due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT deferred appendix statement due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT entry of appearance due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT transcript status report due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT procedural motions due 05/20/2024. APPELLANT dispositive motions due 06/03/2024; directing party to file initial submissions: APPELLEE certificate as to parties due 05/20/2024. APPELLEE entry of appearance due 05/20/2024. APPELLEE procedural motions due 05/20/2024. APPELLEE dispositive motions due 06/03/2024 [24-7050] [Entered: 04/18/2024 08:57 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2050122] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:23-cv-01261-ABJ filed by Ralph Chittams, Kimberly Epps, Stacia Hall, Dick Anthony Heller, Suzzanne Keller, Nicolle S. A. Lyon and Ken Mcclenton. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-7050. [24-7050] [Entered: 04/18/2024 08:54 AM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [24-7050] [Entered: 04/18/2024 08:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
