Valerie Flores v. City of Madison Wisconsin, et al
| Valerie Flores |
| Columbia County, Wisconsin, Sauk County, Wisconsin, Duane County, Wisconsin, Clay Rogers, also known as Merrill, Cody Woods, Matthew Scott Roberds, Allen Horn, City of Madison Wisconsin, Mayor and Wisconsin Board of Regents |
| 24-7076 |
| May 21, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT [2058228] received from Wendy P. [signed for on 05/30/2024] for order [2055454-2] sent to Appellant Valerie Flores [24-7076] [Entered: 06/06/2024 02:28 PM] |
| PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [24-7076] [Entered: 05/21/2024 09:39 AM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2055416] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:23-cv-03871-UNA filed by Valerie Flores. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 24-7076. [24-7076] [Entered: 05/21/2024 09:39 AM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2055431] filed to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 06/20/2024. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [24-7076] [Entered: 05/21/2024 10:13 AM] |
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [2055454] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 9947 8004] of order [ # 2055431-4 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 06/20/2024 from Valerie Flores. [24-7076] [Entered: 05/21/2024 11:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
