Mary DavisIn re: Mary Davis
In re: Mary E. Davis |
24-8502 |
February 28, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [2042630] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.7021 0350 0001 9947 6062] of order [ # 2042627-4 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 03/29/2024 from Mary E. Davis. [24-8502] [Entered: 02/28/2024 11:24 AM] |
CLERK'S ORDER [2042627] filed considering case opening document [ # 2042625-2 ]; to show cause regarding suspending attorney. Response to Order due 03/29/2024. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order.; The Clerk is directed to mail this order to respondent by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [24-8502] [Entered: 02/28/2024 11:15 AM] |
CERTIFIED COPY OF ORDER received from Court of Appeals DC; Case Number: 23-BG-0484; Date of Action: 06/29/2023; Type of Action: suspension. [24-8502] [Entered: 02/28/2024 11:13 AM] |
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE CASE docketed. [24-8502] [Entered: 02/28/2024 11:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Mary DavisIn re: Mary Davis | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: In re: Mary E. Davis | |
Represented By: | Mary E. Davis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.