California Communities Against Toxics, et al v. EPA, et al
| California Communities Against Toxics, Downwinders at Risk, Environmental Defense Fund, Environmental Integrity Project, Hoosier Environmental Council, Louisiana Bucket Brigade, Natural Resources Defense Council, Ohio Citizen Action, Sierra Club, Texas Environmental Justice Advocacy Services, State of California, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra, and the California Air Resources Board, State of Delaware, State of Illinois, State of Maryland, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of New York, State of New Jersey, State of Oregon, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island, Commonwealth of Virginia, State of Washington, City of Chicago, City of New York and State of Wisconsin |
| Environmental Protection Agency and Lee M. Zeldin, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency |
| Air Permitting Forum, American Chemistry Council, American Wood Council, Auto Industry Forum, Brick Industry Association, Portland Cement Association and American Cement Association |
| 25-1259 |
| November 12, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| REPORT [2171598] filed by EPA and Lee M. Zeldin abeyance status is EPA is continuing to evaluate whether to revise the definition of potential to emit [Service Date: 05/04/2026 ] [25-1259] (Glickman, Laura) [Entered: 05/04/2026 10:35 AM] |
| NOTICE [2163159] to substitute party filed by Portland Cement Association [Service Date: 03/11/2026 ] [25-1259] (Broome, Shannon) [Entered: 03/11/2026 04:58 PM] |
| REPORT [2157299] filed by EPA and Lee M. Zeldin abeyance status is EPA is continuing to evaluate whether to revise the definition of potential to emit. [Service Date: 02/03/2026 ] [25-1259] (Glickman, Laura) [Entered: 02/03/2026 12:16 PM] |
| NOTICE [2149269] of intention to paricipate as a party to appeal filed by Air Permitting Forum, American Chemistry Council, American Wood Council, Auto Industry Forum, Brick Industry Association, Portland Cement Association [Service Date: 12/08/2025 ]. [25-1259] (Broome, Shannon) [Entered: 12/08/2025 02:32 PM] |
| PETITION FOR REVIEW CASE docketed. [25-1259] [Entered: 11/12/2025 01:57 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2144911] filed granting joint motion to sever and hold in abeyance several issues before the court and establish briefing schedule for remaining issues [ # 2133540-2 ] and these consolidated cases be returned to the courts active docke. Severing issues related to EPAs revision of the regulatory definition of potential to emit, and assigning a separate docket number, No. 25-1259. Holding No. 25-1259 in abeyance pending further order of the court. Any intervenor in No. 21-1024, et al., who wishes to participate in No. 25-1259 is directed to notify the court in writing within 30 days of the date of this order, and, if seeking to participate as an intervenor, should indicate which party it supports. EPA is directed to file status reports in No. 25-1259 at 90-day intervals beginning 02/03/2026. The parties in No. 25-1259 are directed to file motions to govern further proceedings within 30 days of the completion of agency proceedings regarding the definition of potential to emit." Setting briefing format and schedule (see order for details) in No. 21-1024, et al.: PETITIONERS' Brief(s) due 01/23/2026. RESPONDENTS' Brief due on 04/10/2026. INTERVENOR FOR RESPONDENTS' Brief due 04/17/2026. PETITIONERS' Reply Brief(s) due 05/22/2026. DEFERRED APPENDIX due 06/11/2026. FINAL BRIEFS due 06/18/2026. [21-1024, 21-1034, 25-1259] [Entered: 11/12/2025 02:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.