USA v. Cynthia Ballenger, et al
| United States of America |
| Cynthia Ballenger and Christopher Price |
| 25-3080 |
| July 21, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, U.S. District Court. [25-3080] [Entered: 01/16/2026 03:36 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2154680] filed granting motion to dismiss case as moot [ # 2153048-2 ], The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith. [25-3080] [Entered: 01/16/2026 03:33 PM] |
| UNOPPOSED MOTION [2153048] to dismiss case as moot filed by Cynthia Ballenger and Christopher Price [Service Date: 01/05/2026 ] Length Certification: 261 words. [25-3080] (Kenkeremath, Nandan) [Entered: 01/05/2026 10:17 PM] |
| NOTICE [2149261] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court to supplement record 12/03/2025 Opinion & Order [25-3080] [Entered: 12/08/2025 02:22 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2149263] filed removing case from abeyance; directing party to file motions to govern future proceedings by 01/07/2026 [25-3080] [Entered: 12/08/2025 02:24 PM] |
| NOTICE [2149060] of district court filings filed by Cynthia Ballenger and Christopher Price [Service Date: 12/05/2025 ] [25-3080] (Kenkeremath, Nandan) [Entered: 12/05/2025 05:44 PM] |
| PER CURIAM ORDER [2147175] filed ORDERED that the motion to consolidate be granted in part and denied in part. The Clerk is directed to consolidate Nos. 25-3059, 25-3074, 25-3076, 25-3078, and 25-3093. The motion is denied as to the request to consolidate No. 25-3080, without prejudice. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Catherine E. Stetson, a member of the Bar of this court, be appointed as amicus curiae to present arguments in support of the district court orders appealed in No. 25-3059, et al. It is FURTHER ORDERED, on the courts own motion, that the parties and amicus submit, within 21 days of this order, proposed formats and schedules for the briefing of No. 25-3059, et al. Before Judges: Katsas, Walker and Childs. [25-3059, 25-3074, 25-3076, 25-3078, 25-3080, 25-3093] [Entered: 11/25/2025 12:02 PM] |
| RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION [2141263] to motion to consolidate [ # 2139851-2 ] filed by Hector Emmanuel Vargas Santos [Service Date: 10/20/2025 by Email, CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 4880. [25-3074] (Kenkeremath, Nandan) [Entered: 10/20/2025 11:41 PM] |
| NOTICE [2140314] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is denied [Case Number 25-3080: IFP Denied USDC] [25-3080] [Entered: 10/15/2025 01:13 PM] |
| LETTER [2139820] appointment of amicus filed by USA [Service Date: 10/10/2025 ] [25-3080] (Coleman, Nicholas) [Entered: 10/10/2025 11:47 AM] |
| MOTION [2139854] to consolidate cases filed by USA (Service Date: 10/10/2025 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 1,139 words. [25-3080] (Coleman, Nicholas) [Entered: 10/10/2025 01:00 PM] |
| ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2136220] filed by Nicholas P. Coleman on behalf of Appellee USA. [25-3080] (Coleman, Nicholas) [Entered: 09/22/2025 12:56 PM] |
| CRIMINAL CASE docketed. [25-3080] [Entered: 07/21/2025 02:20 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2126451] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:21-cr-00719-JEB-1 filed by Cynthia Ballenger and Christopher Price. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 25-3080. [25-3080] [Entered: 07/21/2025 02:21 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2126456] filed holding case in abeyance. Case 25-3080 held in abeyance pending decision in 1:21-cr-719-JEB from U.S. District Court. The Clerk is directed to transmit a copy of this order to the district court. [25-3080] [Entered: 07/21/2025 02:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
