Shona Pendse v. Cmsnr. IRS, et al
Plaintiff: Shona S. Pendse
Defendant: Commissioner of Internal Revenue and United States of America
Case Number: 25-5114
Filed: April 14, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2025 CLERK'S ORDER [2120105] filed granting motion to dismiss case voluntarily [ # 2117111-2 ], issuing mandate [25-5114] [Entered: 06/10/2025 03:03 PM]
June 10, 2025 MANDATE ISSUED to Clerk, U.S. District Court. [25-5114] [Entered: 06/10/2025 03:15 PM]
May 22, 2025 RESPONSE [2117111] to order [ # 2110873-2 ], [ # 2110873-3 ] combined with a MOTION to voluntarily dismiss appeal filed by Shona S. Pendse [Service Date: 05/22/2025 by CM/ECF NDA] Length Certification: 1 page. [25-5114]--[Edited 06/10/2025 by EBL--Modified Event] (Pendse, Shona) [Entered: 05/22/2025 06:14 PM]
April 16, 2025 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE [2111360] filed by Marie E. Wicks on behalf of Appellees USA and Cmsnr. IRS. [25-5114] (Wicks, Marie) [Entered: 04/16/2025 01:58 PM]
April 15, 2025 NOTICE [2111179] received from the Clerk of the U.S. District Court leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court is denied [Case Number 25-5114: IFP Denied USDC] [25-5114] [Entered: 04/15/2025 12:14 PM]
April 15, 2025 CLERK'S ORDER [2111180] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis APPELLANT motion to proceed in forma pauperis in this court due 05/15/2025; directing party to file payment of docketing fee APPELLANT payment of docketing fee due 05/15/2025, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [25-5114] [Entered: 04/15/2025 12:22 PM]
April 14, 2025 US CIVIL CASE docketed. [25-5114] [Entered: 04/14/2025 11:34 AM]
April 14, 2025 NOTICE OF APPEAL [2110847] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:25-cv-00633-TNM filed by Shona S. Pendse. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 25-5114. [25-5114] [Entered: 04/14/2025 11:35 AM]
April 14, 2025 CLERK'S ORDER [2110854] filed directing party to file motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or payment of docketing fee. APPELLANT payment of docketing fee or motion to proceed in forma pauperis in district court due 05/14/2025 [25-5114] [Entered: 04/14/2025 11:40 AM]
April 14, 2025 CLERK'S ORDER [2110873] filed to show cause regarding dismissing case for lack of jurisdiction. Response to Order due 05/14/2025. The response may not exceed the length limitations established in the order. [25-5114] [Entered: 04/14/2025 12:14 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Shona Pendse v. Cmsnr. IRS, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shona S. Pendse
Represented By: Shona S. Pendse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Represented By: Marie Wicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By: Marie Wicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?