Arthur Hairston, Sr. v. Courtney Smith, et al
| Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr. |
| Courtney L. Smith, Kenneth M. Carpenter, Brian Griffith, Benjamin Herskovits and Andrew Hunter |
| 25-5120 |
| April 15, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION [2133681] for reconsideration of order [ # 2131849-4 ] filed by Mr. Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr. (Service Date: 09/05/2025 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 21 pages. [25-5120] [Entered: 09/05/2025 01:31 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2131849] filed considering Clerk order [ # 2111187-5 ], dismissing case for lack of prosecution, withholding issuance of the mandate. [25-5120] [Entered: 08/25/2025 01:29 PM] |
| US CIVIL CASE docketed. [25-5120] [Entered: 04/15/2025 12:44 PM] |
| NOTICE OF APPEAL [2111184] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:24-cv-03015-UNA filed by Mr. Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr.. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 25-5120. [25-5120] [Entered: 04/15/2025 12:46 PM] |
| CLERK'S ORDER [2111187] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 06/16/2025. APPENDIX due 06/16/2025, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution; The Clerk is directed to mail this order to appellant by certified mail, return receipt requested and by 1st class mail. [25-5120] [Entered: 04/15/2025 12:52 PM] |
| CERTIFIED AND FIRST CLASS MAIL SENT [2111190] with return receipt requested [Receipt No.95890710527023578531] of order [ # 2111187-4 ]. Certified Mail Receipt due 05/15/2025 from Arthur Lee Hairston Sr.. [25-5120] [Entered: 04/15/2025 01:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
