S.R.B. Kenneth v. TYPSA Group, et al
Plaintiff: S.R.B. Kenneth
Defendant: TYPSA Group and Kingdom of Spain
Case Number: 25-7138
Filed: September 18, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2026 PER CURIAM JUDGMENT [2160839] filed (without memorandum) that the motion for leave to file under seal be granted [ # 2146054-2 ]. The Clerk is directed to file the lodged sealed brief. It is FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district courts August 8, 2025 order dismissing the complaint be affirmed. (SEE JUDGMENT FOR DETAILS) withholding issuance of the mandate. Before Judges: Millett, Pan and Garcia. [25-7138] [Entered: 02/24/2026 03:18 PM]
February 24, 2026 PER ABOVE ORDER lodged Appellant/Petitioner brief [2146056-2] is filed [25-7138] [Entered: 02/24/2026 03:20 PM]
February 9, 2026 PER CURIAM ORDER [2158240] filed that the court will dispose of the appeal without oral argument on the basis of the record and presentation in the brief pursuant to Fed. R. App. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir.Rule 34(j). Before Judges: Millett, Pan and Garcia. [25-7138] [Entered: 02/09/2026 03:39 PM]
November 17, 2025 SEALED APPELLANT BRIEF [2146056] lodged by S.R.B. Kenneth [Service Date: 11/19/2025 ] Length of Brief: 144 pages. [25-7138] [Entered: 11/19/2025 09:26 AM]
November 17, 2025 MOTION [2146054] for leave to file under seal combined with REDACTED APPELLANT BRIEF filed by S.R.B. Kenneth [Service Date: 11/19/2025 ] Length Certification: 9 pages. [25-7138] [Entered: 11/19/2025 09:24 AM]
October 20, 2025 CLERK'S ORDER [2141213] filed granting motion to permit pro se electronic filing [ # 2140903-2 ] [25-7138] [Entered: 10/20/2025 04:42 PM]
October 16, 2025 MOTION [2140903] to permit pro se electronic filing status filed by S.R.B. Kenneth (Service Date: 10/16/2025 by CM/ECF NDA) Length Certification: 3 pages. [25-7138] [Entered: 10/17/2025 02:10 PM]
September 18, 2025 PRIVATE CIVIL CASE docketed. [25-7138] [Entered: 09/18/2025 11:21 AM]
September 18, 2025 NOTICE OF APPEAL [2135534] seeking review of a decision by the U.S. District Court in 1:25-cv-01916-UNA filed by S.R.B. Kenneth. Appeal assigned USCA Case Number: 25-7138. [25-7138] [Entered: 09/18/2025 11:21 AM]
September 18, 2025 CLERK'S ORDER [2135541] filed setting briefing schedule: APPELLANT Brief due 11/07/2025. APPENDIX due 11/07/2025, Failure to respond shall result in dismissal of the case for lack of prosecution [25-7138] [Entered: 09/18/2025 11:27 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: S.R.B. Kenneth v. TYPSA Group, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: S.R.B. Kenneth
Represented By: S.R.B. Kenneth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TYPSA Group
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kingdom of Spain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?